Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amir Barda

dblp:293/8407 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-0531-0352ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Visual content generation and editing · 44% Geometric modeling and processing · 38% Computational fabrication · 18%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Instant3dit: Multiview Inpainting for Fast Editing of 3D Objects · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › 3d-aware diffusion
multi-view diffusion
0.912025
Instant3dit: Multiview Inpainting for Fast Editing of 3D Objects · CVPR 2025
Visual content generation and editing › 3d content editing
3d shape editing
0.912025
Instant3dit: Multiview Inpainting for Fast Editing of 3D Objects · CVPR 2025
Visual content generation and editing
3d content creation
0.812024
MagicClay: Sculpting Meshes With Generative Neural Fields · SIGGRAPH Asia 2024
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › shape editing
mesh editing
0.812024
MagicClay: Sculpting Meshes With Generative Neural Fields · SIGGRAPH Asia 2024
Geometric modeling and processing › computer-aided design
generative design
0.712023
Generative Design of Sheet Metal Structures · ACM Trans. Graph. 2023
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.212023
Generative Design of Sheet Metal Structures · ACM Trans. Graph. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large reconstruction model · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7markov chain monte carlo · 1.3grammar sampling · 1.3continuous optimization · 1.3neural field · 0.8generative model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Instant3dit: Multiview Inpainting for Fast Editing of 3D Objects
abstract
We propose a generative technique to edit 3D shapes, represented as meshes, NeRFs, or Gaussian Splats, in ≈ 3 seconds, without the need for running an SDS type of optimization. Our key insight is to cast 3D editing as a multiview image inpainting problem, as this representation is generic and can be mapped back to any 3D representation using the bank of available Large Reconstruction Models. We explore different fine-tuning strategies to obtain both multiview generation and inpainting capabilities within the same diffusion model. In particular, the design of the inpainting mask is an important factor of training an inpainting model, and we propose several masking strategies to mimic the types of edits a user would perform on a 3D shape. Our approach takes 3D generative editing from hours to seconds and produces higher-quality results compared to previous works.
Amir Barda, Matheus Gadelha, Vladimir G. Kim, Noam Aigerman, Amit Bermano, Thibault Groueix
CVPR1
2024 MagicClay: Sculpting Meshes With Generative Neural Fields
Amir Barda, Vladimir G. Kim, Noam Aigerman, Amit Bermano, Thibault Groueix
SIGGRAPH Asia1
2023 Generative Design of Sheet Metal Structures
abstract
Sheet Metal (SM) fabrication is perhaps one of the most common metalworking technique. Despite its prevalence, SM design is manual and costly, with rigorous practices that restrict the search space, yielding suboptimal results. In contrast, we present a framework for the first automatic design of SM parts. Focusing on load bearing applications, our novel system generates a high-performing manufacturable SM that adheres to the numerous constraints that SM design entails: The resulting part minimizes manufacturing costs while adhering to structural, spatial, and manufacturing constraints. In other words, the part should be strong enough, not disturb the environment, and adhere to the manufacturing process. These desiderata sum up to an elaborate, sparse, and expensive search space. Our generative approach is a carefully designed exploration process, comprising two steps. In Segment Discovery connections from the input load to attachable regions are accumulated, and during Segment Composition the most performing valid combination is searched for. For Discovery, we define a slim grammar, and sample it for parts using a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach, ran in intercommunicating instances (i.e, chains) for diversity. This, followed by a short continuous optimization, enables building a diverse and high-quality library of substructures. During Composition, a valid and minimal cost combination of the curated substructures is selected. To improve compliance significantly without additional manufacturing costs, we reinforce candidate parts onto themselves --- a unique SM capability called self-riveting. we provide our code and data in https://github.com/amir90/AutoSheetMetal. We show our generative approach produces viable parts for numerous scenarios. We compare our system against a human expert and observe improvements in both part quality and design time. We further analyze our pipeline's steps with respect to resulting quality, and have fabricated some results for validation. We hope our system will stretch the field of SM design, replacing costly expert hours with minutes of standard CPU, making this cheap and reliable manufacturing method accessible to anyone.
Amir Barda, Guy Tevet, Adriana Schulz, Amit Bermano
ACM Trans. Graph.1