Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sabyasachi Sahoo

dblp:293/8579 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-0357-912XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 31% Learning paradigms · 21%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › parameter-efficient transfer learning
layer selection
0.912025
A Layer Selection Approach to Test Time Adaptation · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift
0.912025
A Layer Selection Approach to Test Time Adaptation · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
0.912025
A Layer Selection Approach to Test Time Adaptation · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.812024
Detecting Brittle Decisions for Free: Leveraging Margin Consistency in Deep Robust Classifiers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › catastrophic forgetting
catastrophic forgetting mitigation
0.812024
Hessian Aware Low-Rank Perturbation for Order-Robust Continual Learning · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning
0.812024
Hessian Aware Low-Rank Perturbation for Order-Robust Continual Learning · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Detecting Brittle Decisions for Free: Leveraging Margin Consistency in Deep Robust Classifiers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.512021
Dynamic to Static Lidar Scan Reconstruction Using Adversarially Trained Auto Encoder · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation
0.512021
Dynamic to Static Lidar Scan Reconstruction Using Adversarially Trained Auto Encoder · AAAI 2021
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.112021
Dynamic to Static Lidar Scan Reconstruction Using Adversarially Trained Auto Encoder · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial training · 1.3test time adaptation loss · 0.9gradient-based layer selection · 0.9pruning · 0.8low-rank approximation · 0.8hessian analysis · 0.8unsupervised domain adaptation · 0.5autoencoder · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Layer Selection Approach to Test Time Adaptation
abstract
Test Time Adaptation (TTA) addresses the problem of distribution shift by adapting a pretrained model to a new domain during inference. When faced with challenging shifts, most methods collapse and perform worse than the original pretrained model. In this paper, we find that not all layers are equally receptive to the adaptation, and the layers with the most misaligned gradients often cause performance degradation. To address this, we propose GALA, a novel layer selection criterion to identify the most beneficial updates to perform during test time adaptation. This criterion can also filter out unreliable samples with noisy gradients. Its simplicity allows seamless integration with existing TTA loss functions, thereby preventing degradation and focusing adaptation on the most trainable layers. This approach also helps to regularize adaptation to preserve the pretrained features, which are crucial for handling unseen domains. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed layer selection framework improves the performance of existing TTA approaches across multiple datasets, domain shifts, model architectures, and TTA losses.
Sabyasachi Sahoo, Mostafa ElAraby, Jonas Ngnawé, Yann Pequignot, Frédéric Precioso, Christian Gagné 0001
AAAI1
2024 Detecting Brittle Decisions for Free: Leveraging Margin Consistency in Deep Robust Classifiers
abstract
Despite extensive research on adversarial training strategies to improve robustness, the decisions of even the most robust deep learning models can still be quite sensitive to imperceptible perturbations, creating serious risks when deploying them for high-stakes real-world applications. While detecting such cases may be critical, evaluating a model's vulnerability at a per-instance level using adversarial attacks is computationally too intensive and unsuitable for real-time deployment scenarios. The input space margin is the exact score to detect non-robust samples and is intractable for deep neural networks. This paper introduces the concept of margin consistency -- a property that links the input space margins and the logit margins in robust models -- for efficient detection of vulnerable samples. First, we establish that margin consistency is a necessary and sufficient condition to use a model's logit margin as a score for identifying non-robust samples. Next, through comprehensive empirical analysis of various robustly trained models on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets, we show that they indicate high margin consistency with a strong correlation between their input space margins and the logit margins. Then, we show that we can effectively use the logit margin to confidently detect brittle decisions with such models. Finally, we address cases where the model is not sufficiently margin-consistent by learning a pseudo-margin from the feature representation. Our findings highlight the potential of leveraging deep representations to efficiently assess adversarial vulnerability in deployment scenarios.
Jonas Ngnawé, Sabyasachi Sahoo, Yann Pequignot, Frédéric Precioso, Christian Gagné 0001
NeurIPS2
2024 Hessian Aware Low-Rank Perturbation for Order-Robust Continual Learning
abstract
Continual learning aims to learn a series of tasks sequentially without forgetting the knowledge acquired from the previous ones. In this work, we propose the Hessian Aware Low-Rank Perturbation algorithm for continual learning. By modeling the parameter transitions along the sequential tasks with the weight matrix transformation, we propose to apply the low-rank approximation on the task-adaptive parameters in each layer of the neural networks. Specifically, we theoretically demonstrate the quantitative relationship between the Hessian and the proposed low-rank approximation. The approximation ranks are then globally determined according to the marginal change of the empirical loss estimated by the layer-specific gradient and low-rank approximation error. Furthermore, we control the model capacity by pruning less important parameters to diminish the parameter growth. We conduct extensive experiments on various benchmarks, including a dataset with large-scale tasks, and compare our method against some recent state-of-the-art methods to demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of our proposed method. Empirical results show that our method performs better on different benchmarks, especially in achieving task order robustness and handling the forgetting issue.
Jiaqi Li 0005, Yuanhao Lai, Rui Wang 0121, Changjian Shui, Sabyasachi Sahoo, Charles Ling 0001, Boyu Wang 0004, Christian Gagné 0001, Fan Zhou 0006
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.5
2023 Differentiable SLAM Helps Deep Learning-based LiDAR Perception Tasks
Dheeraj Vattikonda, Vedang Bhupesh Shenvi Nadkarni, Erqun Dong, Sabyasachi Sahoo
BMVC5
2021 Dynamic to Static Lidar Scan Reconstruction Using Adversarially Trained Auto Encoder
abstract
Accurate reconstruction of static environments from LiDAR scans of scenes containing dynamic objects, which we refer to as Dynamic to Static Translation (DST), is an important area of research in Autonomous Navigation. This problem has been recently explored for visual SLAM, but to the best of our knowledge no work has been attempted to address DST for LiDAR scans. The problem is of critical importance due to wide-spread adoption of LiDAR in Autonomous Vehicles. We show that state-of the art methods developed for the visual domain when adapted for LiDAR scans perform poorly. We develop DSLR, a deep generative model which learns a mapping between dynamic scan to its static counterpart through an adversarially trained autoencoder. Our model yields the first solution for DST on LiDAR that generates static scans without using explicit segmentation labels. DSLR cannot always be applied to real world data due to lack of paired dynamic-static scans. Using Unsupervised Domain Adaptation, we propose DSLR-UDA for transfer to real world data and experimentally show that this performs well in real world settings. Additionally, if segmentation information is available, we extend DSLR to DSLR-Seg to further improve the reconstruction quality. DSLR gives the state of the art performance on simulated and real-world datasets and also shows at least 4× improvement. We show that DSLR, unlike the existing baselines, is a practically viable model with its reconstruction quality within the tolerable limits for tasks pertaining to autonomous navigation like SLAM in dynamic environments.
Sabyasachi Sahoo, Vanshil Shah, Vineetha Kondameedi, Akshaj Verma, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Vinay Vishwanath
AAAI2