Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edson Dias
dblp:294/1196
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7658-619XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | What Makes a Great Maintainer of Open Source Projects? · ICSE 2021 |
Empirical software engineering › open source software
open-source maintainers |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | What Makes a Great Maintainer of Open Source Projects? · ICSE 2021 |
Collaborative and social computing
online communities |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | What Makes a Great Maintainer of Open Source Projects? · ICSE 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 1.0semi-structured interviews · 1.0conceptual framework · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Supporting software engineering managers in talent retention: The Brazilian context
Luiz Alexandre Martins Costa, Edson Dias, Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro, Awdren de Lima Fontão, Gustavo Pinto 0001, Rodrigo Pereira dos Santos, Alexander Serebrenik |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 2 |
| 2021 | What Makes a Great Maintainer of Open Source Projects?abstractAlthough Open Source Software (OSS) maintainers devote a significant proportion of their work to coding tasks, great maintainers must excel in many other activities beyond coding. Maintainers should care about fostering a community, helping new members to find their place, while also saying "no" to patches that although are well-coded and well-tested, do not contribute to the goal of the project. To perform all these activities masterfully, maintainers should exercise attributes that software engineers (working on closed source projects) do not always need to master. This paper aims to uncover, relate, and prioritize the unique attributes that great OSS maintainers might have. To achieve this goal, we conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with well-experienced maintainers that are the gatekeepers of notable projects such as the Linux Kernel, the Debian operating system, and the GitLab coding platform. After we analyzed the interviews and curated a list of attributes, we created a conceptual framework to explain how these attributes are connected. We then conducted a rating survey with 90 OSS contributors. We noted that "technical excellence" and "communication" are the most recurring attributes. When grouped, these attributes fit into four broad categories: management, social, technical, and personality. While we noted that "sustain a long term vision of the project" and being "extremely careful" seem to form the basis of our framework, we noted through our survey that the communication attribute was perceived as the most essential one. Edson Dias, Paulo Meirelles, Fernando Castor Filho, Igor Steinmacher, Igor Scaliante Wiese, Gustavo Pinto 0001 |
ICSE | 1 |