Randomized controlled trials often suffer from interference, a violation of the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA), where a unit's outcome is influenced by its neighbors' treatment assignments. This interference biases naive estimators of the average treatment effect (ATE). A popular method to achieve unbiasedness pairs the Horvitz-Thompson estimator of the ATE with a known exposure mapping, a function that identifies units in a given randomization unaffected by interference. For example, an exposure mapping may stipulate that a unit experiences no further interference if at least an $h$-fraction of its neighbors share its treatment status. However, selecting this threshold $h$ is challenging, requiring domain expertise; in its absence, fixed thresholds such as $h = 1$ are often used. In this work, we propose a data-adaptive method to select the $h$-fractional threshold that minimizes the mean-squared-error (MSE) of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator. Our approach estimates the bias and variance of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator paired with candidate thresholds by leveraging a first-order approximation, specifically, linear regression of potential outcomes on exposures. We present simulations illustrating that our method improves upon non-adaptive threshold choices, and an adapted Lepski's method. We further illustrate the performance of our estimator by running experiments with synthetic outcomes on a real village network dataset, and on a publicly-available Amazon product similarity graph. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our method remains robust to deviations from the linear potential outcomes model.

We demonstrate an AI agent for the card game of Gin Rummy. The agent uses simple heuristics in conjunction with a model that predicts the probability of each card's being in the opponent's hand. To estimate the probabilities for cards' being in the opponent's hand, we generate a dataset of Gin Rummy games using self-play, and train a random forest on the game information states. We explore the random forest classifier we trained and study the correspondence between its outputs and intuitively correct outputs. Our agent wins 61% of games against a baseline heuristic agent that does not use opponent hand estimation.