Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

George Orfanides

dblp:294/7420 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Speech recognition and synthesis · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
difference of convex programming
1.522025
Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
difference of submodular minimization
1.522025
Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.912025
Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.712023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.712023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
submodular function minimization
0.712023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.212023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

DC algorithm · 2.2convex-concave procedure · 1.3discretization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization
abstract
Submodular functions, defined on continuous or discrete domains, arise in numerous applications. We study the minimization of the difference of submodular (DS) functions, over both domains, extending prior work restricted to set functions. We show that all functions on discrete domains and all smooth functions on continuous domains are DS. For discrete domains, we observe that DS minimization is equivalent to minimizing the difference of two convex (DC) functions, as in the set function case. We propose a novel variant of the DC Algorithm (DCA) and apply it to the resulting DC Program, obtaining comparable theoretical guarantees as in the set function case. The algorithm can be applied to continuous domains via discretization. Experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines in integer compressive sensing and integer least squares.
George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel, Marwa El Halabi
ICML1
2023 Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming
abstract
Minimizing the difference of two submodular (DS) functions is a problem that naturally occurs in various machine learning problems. Although it is well known that a DS problem can be equivalently formulated as the minimization of the difference of two convex (DC) functions, existing algorithms do not fully exploit this connection. A classical algorithm for DC problems is called the DC algorithm (DCA). We introduce variants of DCA and its complete form (CDCA) that we apply to the DC program corresponding to DS minimization. We extend existing convergence properties of DCA, and connect them to convergence properties on the DS problem. Our results on DCA match the theoretical guarantees satisfied by existing DS algorithms, while providing a more complete characterization of convergence properties. In the case of CDCA, we obtain a stronger local minimality guarantee. Our numerical results show that our proposed algorithms outperform existing baselines on two applications: speech corpus selection and feature selection.
Marwa El Halabi, George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel
ICML2