Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benoît Malézieux

dblp:294/8389 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17% Vision and language · 17%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
brain-computer interface
0.712023
Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.712023
Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.712023
Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
sliced wasserstein distance
0.712023
Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning
0.612022
Understanding approximate and unrolled dictionary learning for pattern recovery · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
reproducible benchmarking
0.612022
Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks · NeurIPS 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.612022
Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.612022
Understanding approximate and unrolled dictionary learning for pattern recovery · ICLR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

riemannian geometry · 1.3kernel methods · 1.3unrolled optimization · 1.1reproducibility · 1.1benchmarking automation · 1.1approximate dictionary learning · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Analysis and Synthesis Denoisers for Forward-Backward Plug-and-Play Algorithms
abstract
Abstract. In this work we study the behavior of the forward-backward (FB) algorithm when the proximity operator is replaced by a subiterative procedure to approximate a Gaussian denoiser, in a Plug-and-Play (PnP) fashion. Specifically, we consider both analysis and synthesis Gaussian denoisers within a dictionary framework, obtained by unrolling dual-FB iterations or FB iterations, respectively. We analyze the associated minimization problems as well as the asymptotic behavior of the resulting FB-PnP iterations. In particular, we show that the synthesis Gaussian denoising problem can be viewed as a proximity operator. For each case, analysis, and synthesis, we show that the FB-PnP algorithms solve the same problem whether we use only one or an infinite number of subiteration to solve the denoising problem at each iteration. To this aim, we show that each “one subiteration” strategy within the FB-PnP can be interpreted as a primal-dual algorithm when a warm-restart strategy is used. We further present similar results when using a Moreau–Yosida smoothing of the global problem, for an arbitrary number of subiterations. Finally, we provide numerical simulations to illustrate our theoretical results. In particular we first consider a toy compressive sensing example, as well as an image restoration problem in a deep dictionary framework.
Matthieu Kowalski, Benoît Malézieux, Thomas Moreau 0001, Audrey Repetti
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.2
2023 Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals
abstract
When dealing with electro or magnetoencephalography records, many supervised prediction tasks are solved by working with covariance matrices to summarize the signals. Learning with these matrices requires the usage of Riemanian geometry to account for their structure. In this paper, we propose a new method to deal with distributions of covariance matrices, and demonstrate its computational efficiency on M/EEG multivariate time series. More specifically, we define a Sliced-Wasserstein distance between measures of symmetric positive definite matrices that comes with strong theoretical guarantees. Then, we take advantage of its properties and kernel methods to apply this discrepancy to brain-age prediction from MEG data, and compare it to state-of-the-art algorithms based on Riemannian geometry. Finally, we show that it is an efficient surrogate to the Wasserstein distance in domain adaptation for Brain Computer Interface applications.
Clément Bonet, Benoît Malézieux, Alain Rakotomamonjy, Lucas Drumetz, Thomas Moreau 0001, Matthieu Kowalski, Nicolas Courty
ICML2
2022 Understanding approximate and unrolled dictionary learning for pattern recovery
Benoît Malézieux, Thomas Moreau 0001, Matthieu Kowalski
ICLR1
2022 Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks
abstract
Numerical validation is at the core of machine learning research as it allows us to assess the actual impact of new methods, and to confirm the agreement between theory and practice. Yet, the rapid development of the field poses several challenges: researchers are confronted with a profusion of methods to compare, limited transparency and consensus on best practices, as well as tedious re-implementation work. As a result, validation is often very partial, which can lead to wrong conclusions that slow down the progress of research. We propose Benchopt, a collaborative framework to automatize, publish and reproduce optimization benchmarks in machine learning across programming languages and hardware architectures. Benchopt simplifies benchmarking for the community by providing an off-the-shelf tool for running, sharing and extending experiments. To demonstrate its broad usability, we showcase benchmarks on three standard ML tasks: $\ell_2$-regularized logistic regression, Lasso and ResNet18 training for image classification. These benchmarks highlight key practical findings that give a more nuanced view of state-of-the-art for these problems, showing that for practical evaluation, the devil is in the details.
Thomas Moreau 0001, Mathurin Massias, Alexandre Gramfort, Pierre Ablin, Pierre-Antoine Bannier, Benjamin Charlier, Mathieu Dagréou, Tom Dupré la Tour, Ghislain Durif, Cássio Fraga Dantas, Quentin Klopfenstein, Johan Larsson 0002, En Lai, Tanguy Lefort, Benoît Malézieux, Badr Moufad, Alain Rakotomamonjy, Zaccharie Ramzi, Joseph Salmon, Samuel Vaiter
NeurIPS15