Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benoît Malézieux
dblp:294/8389
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17% Vision and language · 17% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
brain-computer interface |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
sliced wasserstein distance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG Signals · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Understanding approximate and unrolled dictionary learning for pattern recovery · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
reproducible benchmarking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Understanding approximate and unrolled dictionary learning for pattern recovery · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
riemannian geometry · 1.3kernel methods · 1.3unrolled optimization · 1.1reproducibility · 1.1benchmarking automation · 1.1approximate dictionary learning · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Analysis and Synthesis Denoisers for Forward-Backward Plug-and-Play AlgorithmsabstractAbstract. In this work we study the behavior of the forward-backward (FB) algorithm when the proximity operator is replaced by a subiterative procedure to approximate a Gaussian denoiser, in a Plug-and-Play (PnP) fashion. Specifically, we consider both analysis and synthesis Gaussian denoisers within a dictionary framework, obtained by unrolling dual-FB iterations or FB iterations, respectively. We analyze the associated minimization problems as well as the asymptotic behavior of the resulting FB-PnP iterations. In particular, we show that the synthesis Gaussian denoising problem can be viewed as a proximity operator. For each case, analysis, and synthesis, we show that the FB-PnP algorithms solve the same problem whether we use only one or an infinite number of subiteration to solve the denoising problem at each iteration. To this aim, we show that each “one subiteration” strategy within the FB-PnP can be interpreted as a primal-dual algorithm when a warm-restart strategy is used. We further present similar results when using a Moreau–Yosida smoothing of the global problem, for an arbitrary number of subiterations. Finally, we provide numerical simulations to illustrate our theoretical results. In particular we first consider a toy compressive sensing example, as well as an image restoration problem in a deep dictionary framework. Matthieu Kowalski, Benoît Malézieux, Thomas Moreau 0001, Audrey Repetti |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 2 |
| 2023 | Sliced-Wasserstein on Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices for M/EEG SignalsabstractWhen dealing with electro or magnetoencephalography records, many supervised prediction tasks are solved by working with covariance matrices to summarize the signals. Learning with these matrices requires the usage of Riemanian geometry to account for their structure. In this paper, we propose a new method to deal with distributions of covariance matrices, and demonstrate its computational efficiency on M/EEG multivariate time series. More specifically, we define a Sliced-Wasserstein distance between measures of symmetric positive definite matrices that comes with strong theoretical guarantees. Then, we take advantage of its properties and kernel methods to apply this discrepancy to brain-age prediction from MEG data, and compare it to state-of-the-art algorithms based on Riemannian geometry. Finally, we show that it is an efficient surrogate to the Wasserstein distance in domain adaptation for Brain Computer Interface applications. Clément Bonet, Benoît Malézieux, Alain Rakotomamonjy, Lucas Drumetz, Thomas Moreau 0001, Matthieu Kowalski, Nicolas Courty |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Understanding approximate and unrolled dictionary learning for pattern recovery
Benoît Malézieux, Thomas Moreau 0001, Matthieu Kowalski |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarksabstractNumerical validation is at the core of machine learning research as it allows us to assess the actual impact of new methods, and to confirm the agreement between theory and practice. Yet, the rapid development of the field poses several challenges: researchers are confronted with a profusion of methods to compare, limited transparency and consensus on best practices, as well as tedious re-implementation work. As a result, validation is often very partial, which can lead to wrong conclusions that slow down the progress of research. We propose Benchopt, a collaborative framework to automatize, publish and reproduce optimization benchmarks in machine learning across programming languages and hardware architectures. Benchopt simplifies benchmarking for the community by providing an off-the-shelf tool for running, sharing and extending experiments. To demonstrate its broad usability, we showcase benchmarks on three standard ML tasks: $\ell_2$-regularized logistic regression, Lasso and ResNet18 training for image classification. These benchmarks highlight key practical findings that give a more nuanced view of state-of-the-art for these problems, showing that for practical evaluation, the devil is in the details. Thomas Moreau 0001, Mathurin Massias, Alexandre Gramfort, Pierre Ablin, Pierre-Antoine Bannier, Benjamin Charlier, Mathieu Dagréou, Tom Dupré la Tour, Ghislain Durif, Cássio Fraga Dantas, Quentin Klopfenstein, Johan Larsson 0002, En Lai, Tanguy Lefort, Benoît Malézieux, Badr Moufad, Alain Rakotomamonjy, Zaccharie Ramzi, Joseph Salmon, Samuel Vaiter |
NeurIPS | 15 |