EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mobin Y. Jeloudar
dblp:294/8567
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 33% Approximation and online algorithms · 33% Algorithms and data structures · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
approximate matching |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic Environment · EC 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
matching theory |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic Environment · EC 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic Environment · EC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
coupling argument · 0.5approximation analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Decentralized Matching in a Probabilistic EnvironmentabstractWe consider a model for repeated stochastic matching where compatibility is probabilistic, is realized the first time agents are matched, and persists in the future. Such a model has applications in the gig economy, kidney exchange, and mentorship matching. We ask whether adecentralized matching process can approximate the optimal online algorithm. In particular, we consider a decentralizedstable matching process where agents match with the most compatible partner who does not prefer matching with someone else, and known compatible pairs continue matching in all future rounds. We demonstrate that the above process provides a 0.316-approximation to the optimal online algorithm for matching on general graphs. We also provide a 1/7-approximation for many-to-one bipartite matching, a 1/11-approximation for capacitated matching on general graphs, and a 1/2k-approximation for forming teams of up to k agents. Our results rely on a novel coupling argument that decomposes the successful edges of the optimal online algorithm in terms of their round-by-round comparison with stable matching. Mobin Y. Jeloudar, Irene Lo, Tristan Pollner, Amin Saberi |
EC | 1 |