Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Quinlan Dawkins
dblp:294/8687
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 36% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 32% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 32% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 54% Computational social science and digital humanities · 46% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | First-Order Convex Fitting and Its Application to Economics and Optimization · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Diffusion Source Identification on Networks with Statistical Confidence · ICML 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › dynamic pricing
online pricing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Limits of Optimal Pricing in the Dark · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computational finance and economics
economic modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | First-Order Convex Fitting and Its Application to Economics and Optimization · AAAI 2022 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › social network analysis
information diffusion |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Diffusion Source Identification on Networks with Statistical Confidence · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hypothesis testing · 1.5confidence set inference · 1.5first-order methods · 1.1mechanism design · 1.0learning algorithms · 0.5learning algorithm · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | First-Order Convex Fitting and Its Application to Economics and Optimization
Quinlan Dawkins, Minbiao Han |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Diffusion Source Identification on Networks with Statistical ConfidenceabstractDiffusion source identification on networks is a problem of fundamental importance in a broad class of applications, including controlling the spreading of rumors on social media, identifying a computer virus over cyber networks, or identifying the disease center during epidemiology. Though this problem has received significant recent attention, most known approaches are well-studied in only very restrictive settings and lack theoretical guarantees for more realistic networks. We introduce a statistical framework for the study of this problem and develop a confidence set inference approach inspired by hypothesis testing. Our method efficiently produces a small subset of nodes, which provably covers the source node with any pre-specified confidence level without restrictive assumptions on network structures. To our knowledge, this is the first diffusion source identification method with a practically useful theoretical guarantee on general networks. We demonstrate our approach via extensive synthetic experiments on well-known random network models, a large data set of real-world networks as well as a mobility network between cities concerning the COVID-19 spreading in January 2020. Quinlan Dawkins, Tianxi Li |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | The Limits of Optimal Pricing in the DarkabstractA ubiquitous learning problem in today’s digital market is, during repeated interactions between a seller and a buyer, how a seller can gradually learn optimal pricing decisions based on the buyer’s past purchase responses. A fundamental challenge of learning in such a strategic setup is that the buyer will naturally have incentives to manipulate his responses in order to induce more favorable learning outcomes for him. To understand the limits of the seller’s learning when facing such a strategic and possibly manipulative buyer, we study a natural yet powerful buyer manipulation strategy. That is, before the pricing game starts, the buyer simply commits to “imitate” a different value function by pretending to always react optimally according to this imitative value function. We fully characterize the optimal imitative value function that the buyer should imitate as well as the resultant seller revenue and buyer surplus under this optimal buyer manipulation. Our characterizations reveal many useful insights about what happens at equilibrium. For example, a seller with concave production cost will obtain essentially 0 revenue at equilibrium whereas the revenue for a seller with convex production cost is the Bregman divergence of her cost function between no production and certain production. Finally, and importantly, we show that a more powerful class of pricing schemes does not necessarily increase, in fact, may be harmful to, the seller’s revenue. Our results not only lead to an effective prescriptive way for buyers to manipulate learning algorithms but also shed lights on the limits of what a seller can really achieve when pricing in the dark. Quinlan Dawkins, Minbiao Han |
NeurIPS | 1 |