Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rishabh Anand

dblp:294/8831 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Language models and text generation · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning
0.912025
HELM: Hyperbolic Large Language Models via Mixture-of-Curvature Experts · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.912025
HELM: Hyperbolic Large Language Models via Mixture-of-Curvature Experts · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.912025
HELM: Hyperbolic Large Language Models via Mixture-of-Curvature Experts · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
geometric deep learning
0.912025
gRNAde: Geometric Deep Learning for 3D RNA inverse design · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA design
0.912025
gRNAde: Geometric Deep Learning for 3D RNA inverse design · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.312025
HELM: Hyperbolic Large Language Models via Mixture-of-Curvature Experts · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.312025
HELM: Hyperbolic Large Language Models via Mixture-of-Curvature Experts · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-state GNN · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7autoregressive decoding · 1.7rotary positional encoding · 0.9multi-head latent attention · 0.9hyperbolic geometry · 0.9RMS normalization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 gRNAde: Geometric Deep Learning for 3D RNA inverse design
abstract
Computational RNA design tasks are often posed as inverse problems, where sequences are designed based on adopting a single desired secondary structure without considering 3D conformational diversity. We introduce gRNAde, a geometric RNA design pipeline operating on 3D RNA backbones to design sequences that explicitly account for structure and dynamics. gRNAde uses a multi-state Graph Neural Network and autoregressive decoding to generates candidate RNA sequences conditioned on one or more 3D backbone structures where the identities of the bases are unknown. On a single-state fixed backbone re-design benchmark of 14 RNA structures from the PDB identified by Das et al. (2010), gRNAde obtains higher native sequence recovery rates (56% on average) compared to Rosetta (45% on average), taking under a second to produce designs compared to the reported hours for Rosetta. We further demonstrate the utility of gRNAde on a new benchmark of multi-state design for structurally flexible RNAs, as well as zero-shot ranking of mutational fitness landscapes in a retrospective analysis of a recent ribozyme. Experimental wet lab validation on 10 different structured RNA backbones finds that gRNAde has a success rate of 50% at designing pseudoknotted RNA structures, a significant advance over 35% for Rosetta. Open source code and tutorials are available at: github.com/chaitjo/geometric-rna-design
Chaitanya K. Joshi, Arian Rokkum Jamasb, Ramón Viñas 0001, Charles Harris, Simon V. Mathis, Alex Morehead, Rishabh Anand, Pietro Liò
ICLR7
2025 HELM: Hyperbolic Large Language Models via Mixture-of-Curvature Experts
abstract
Frontier large language models (LLMs) have shown great success in text modeling and generation tasks across domains. However, natural language exhibits inherent semantic hierarchies and nuanced geometric structure, which current LLMs do not capture completely owing to their reliance on Euclidean operations such as dot-products and norms. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that not respecting the underlying geometry of token embeddings leads to training instabilities and degradation of generative capabilities. These findings suggest that shifting to non-Euclidean geometries can better align language models with the underlying geometry of text. We thus propose to operate fully in $\textit{Hyperbolic space}$, known for its expansive, scale-free, and low-distortion properties. To this end, we introduce $\textbf{HELM}$, a family of $\textbf{H}$yp$\textbf{E}$rbolic Large $\textbf{L}$anguage $\textbf{M}$odels, offering a geometric rethinking of the Transformer-based LLM that addresses the representational inflexibility, missing set of necessary operations, and poor scalability of existing hyperbolic LMs. We additionally introduce a $\textbf{Mi}$xture-of-$\textbf{C}$urvature $\textbf{E}$xperts model, $\textbf{HELM-MiCE}$, where each expert operates in a distinct curvature space to encode more fine-grained geometric structure from text, as well as a dense model, $\textbf{HELM-D}$. For $\textbf{HELM-MiCE}$, we further develop hyperbolic Multi-Head Latent Attention ($\textbf{HMLA}$) for efficient, reduced-KV-cache training and inference. For both models, we further develop essential hyperbolic equivalents of rotary positional encodings and root mean square normalization. We are the first to train fully hyperbolic LLMs at billion-parameter scale, and evaluate them on well-known benchmarks such as MMLU and ARC, spanning STEM problem-solving, general knowledge, and commonsense reasoning. Our results show consistent gains from our $\textbf{HELM}$ architectures – up to 4\% – over popular Euclidean architectures used in LLaMA and DeepSeek with superior semantic hierarchy modeling capabilities, highlighting the efficacy and enhanced reasoning afforded by hyperbolic geometry in large-scale language model pretraining.
Neil He, Rishabh Anand, Hiren Madhu, Ali Maatouk, Smita Krishnaswamy, Leandros Tassiulas, Menglin Yang 0001, Rex Ying
NeurIPS2