Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lichuan Xiang
dblp:294/8850
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 56% Generative modeling · 37% Optimization for machine learning · 6% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
2.4 | 3 | 2025 | Shortcutting Pre-trained Flow Matching Diffusion Models is Almost Free Lunch · NeurIPS 2025 DPaI: Differentiable Pruning at Initialization with Node-Path Balance Principle · ICLR 2025 Towards Data-Agnostic Pruning At Initialization: What Makes a Good Sparse Mask? · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Shortcutting Pre-trained Flow Matching Diffusion Models is Almost Free Lunch · NeurIPS 2025 FlexControl: Computation-Aware Conditional Control with Differentiable Router for Text-to-Image Generation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › DNN pruning
pruning at initialization |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | DPaI: Differentiable Pruning at Initialization with Node-Path Balance Principle · ICLR 2025 Towards Data-Agnostic Pruning At Initialization: What Makes a Good Sparse Mask? · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Towards Neural Architecture Search through Hierarchical Generative Modeling · ICML 2024 Zero-Cost Operation Scoring in Differentiable Architecture Search · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
controllable generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FlexControl: Computation-Aware Conditional Control with Differentiable Router for Text-to-Image Generation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shortcutting Pre-trained Flow Matching Diffusion Models is Almost Free Lunch · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shortcutting Pre-trained Flow Matching Diffusion Models is Almost Free Lunch · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FlexControl: Computation-Aware Conditional Control with Differentiable Router for Text-to-Image Generation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Neural Architecture Search through Hierarchical Generative Modeling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search › one-shot neural architecture search
differentiable architecture search |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Zero-Cost Operation Scoring in Differentiable Architecture Search · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
zero-cost proxy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Zero-Cost Operation Scoring in Differentiable Architecture Search · AAAI 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Data-Agnostic Pruning At Initialization: What Makes a Good Sparse Mask? · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
velocity field learning · 0.9self-distillation · 0.9online distillation · 0.9gradient-based pruning · 0.9gating mechanism · 0.9differentiable optimization · 0.9computation-aware loss · 0.9zero-cost proxies · 0.8transformer · 0.8continuous normalizing flow · 0.8multi-objective optimization · 0.7effective path analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | DPaI: Differentiable Pruning at Initialization with Node-Path Balance PrincipleabstractPruning at Initialization (PaI) is a technique in neural network optimization characterized by the proactive elimination of weights before the network's training on designated tasks. This innovative strategy potentially reduces the costs for training and inference, significantly advancing computational efficiency. A key factor leading to PaI's effectiveness is that it considers the saliency of weights in an untrained network, and prioritizes the trainability and optimization potential of the pruned subnetworks. Recent methods can effectively prevent the formation of hard-to-optimize networks, e.g. through iterative adjustments at each network layer. However, this way often results in large-scale discrete optimization problems, which could make PaI further challenging. This paper introduces a novel method, called DPaI, that involves a differentiable optimization of the pruning mask. DPaI adopts a dynamic and adaptable pruning process, allowing easier optimization processes and better solutions. More importantly, our differentiable formulation enables readily use of the existing rich body of efficient gradient-based methods for PaI. Our empirical results demonstrate that DPaI significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art PaI methods on various architectures, such as Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision-Transformers. Code is available at https://github.com/QuanNguyen-Tri/DPaI.git Lichuan Xiang, Quan Nguyen-Tri, Lan-Cuong Nguyen, Khoat Than, Long Tran-Thanh, Hongkai Wen 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | FlexControl: Computation-Aware Conditional Control with Differentiable Router for Text-to-Image GenerationabstractSpatial conditioning control offers a powerful way to guide diffusion-based generative models. Yet, most implementations (e.g., ControlNet) rely on ad-hoc heuristics to choose which network blocks to control — an approach that varies unpredictably with different tasks. To address this gap, we propose FlexControl, a novel framework that equips all diffusion blocks with control signals during training and employs a trainable gating mechanism to dynamically select which control signal to activate at each denoising step. By introducing a computation-aware loss, we can encourage the control signal to activate only when it benefits the generation quality. By eliminating manual control unit selection, FlexControl enhances adaptability across diverse tasks and streamlines the design pipeline with computation-aware training loss in an end-to-end training manner. Through comprehensive experiments on both UNet and DiT architectures on different control methods, we show that our method can upgrade existing controllable generative models in certain key aspects of interest. As evidenced by both quantitative and qualitative evaluations, FlexControl preserves or enhances image fidelity while also reducing computational overhead by selectively activating the most relevant blocks to control. These results underscore the potential of a flexible, data-driven approach for controlled diffusion and open new avenues for efficient generative model design. The code will soon be available at https://github.com/Daryu-Fan/FlexControl. Lichuan Xiang, Kaicheng Zhou, Hongkai Wen 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Shortcutting Pre-trained Flow Matching Diffusion Models is Almost Free LunchabstractWe present an ultra-efficient post-training method for shortcutting large-scale pre-trained flow matching diffusion models into efficient few-step samplers, enabled by novel velocity field self-distillation. While shortcutting in flow matching, originally introduced by shortcut models, offers flexible trajectory-skipping capabilities, it requires a specialized step-size embedding incompatible with existing models unless retraining from scratch—a process nearly as costly as pretraining itself.
Our key contribution is thus imparting a more aggressive shortcut mechanism to standard flow matching models (e.g., Flux), leveraging a unique distillation principle that obviates the need for step-size embedding. Working on the velocity field rather than sample space and learning rapidly from self-guided distillation in an online manner, our approach trains efficiently, e.g., producing a 3-step Flux <1 A100 day. Beyond distillation, our method can be incorporated into the pretraining stage itself, yielding models that inherently learn efficient, few-step flows without compromising quality. This capability also enables, to our knowledge, the first few-shot distillation method (e.g., 10 text-image pairs) for dozen-billion-parameter diffusion models, delivering state-of-the-art performance at almost free cost. Qianli Chen, Lichuan Xiang, Hongkai Wen 0001 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | Towards Neural Architecture Search through Hierarchical Generative ModelingabstractNeural Architecture Search (NAS) aims to automate deep neural network design across various applications, while a good search space design is core to NAS performance. A too-narrow search space may fail to cover diverse task requirements, whereas a too-broad one can escalate computational expenses and reduce efficiency. %We propose automatically generating the search space to tailor it to specific task conditions, optimizing search costs and producing viable architectures. In this work, we aim to address this challenge by leaning on the recent advances in generative modelling -- we propose a novel method that can navigate through an extremely large, general-purpose initial search space efficiently by training a two-level generative model hierarchy. The first level uses Conditional Continuous Normalizing Flow (CCNF) for micro-cell design, while the second employs a transformer-based sequence generator to craft macro architectures aligned with task needs and architectural constraints. To ensure computational feasibility, we pretrain the generative models in a task-agnostic manner using a metric space of graph and zero-cost (ZC) similarities between architectures. We show our approach can achieve state-of-the-art performance among other low-cost NAS methods across different tasks on CIFAR-10/100, ImageNet and NAS-Bench-360. Lichuan Xiang, Lukasz Dudziak, Mohamed S. Abdelfattah, Abhinav Mehrotra, Nicholas D. Lane, Hongkai Wen 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Zero-Cost Operation Scoring in Differentiable Architecture SearchabstractWe formalize and analyze a fundamental component of dif- ferentiable neural architecture search (NAS): local “opera- tion scoring” at each operation choice. We view existing operation scoring functions as inexact proxies for accuracy, and we find that they perform poorly when analyzed empir- ically on NAS benchmarks. From this perspective, we intro- duce a novel perturbation-based zero-cost operation scor- ing (Zero-Cost-PT) approach, which utilizes zero-cost prox- ies that were recently studied in multi-trial NAS but de- grade significantly on larger search spaces, typical for dif- ferentiable NAS. We conduct a thorough empirical evalu- ation on a number of NAS benchmarks and large search spaces, from NAS-Bench-201, NAS-Bench-1Shot1, NAS- Bench-Macro, to DARTS-like and MobileNet-like spaces, showing significant improvements in both search time and accuracy. On the ImageNet classification task on the DARTS search space, our approach improved accuracy compared to the best current training-free methods (TE-NAS) while be- ing over 10× faster (total searching time 25 minutes on a single GPU), and observed significantly better transferabil- ity on architectures searched on the CIFAR-10 dataset with an accuracy increase of 1.8 pp. Our code is available at: https://github.com/zerocostptnas/zerocost operation score. Lichuan Xiang, Lukasz Dudziak, Mohamed S. Abdelfattah, Thomas C. P. Chau, Nicholas D. Lane, Hongkai Wen 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Towards Data-Agnostic Pruning At Initialization: What Makes a Good Sparse Mask?abstractPruning at initialization (PaI) aims to remove weights of neural networks before training in pursuit of training efficiency besides the inference. While off-the-shelf PaI methods manage to find trainable subnetworks that outperform random pruning, their performance in terms of both accuracy and computational reduction is far from satisfactory compared to post-training pruning and the understanding of PaI is missing. For instance, recent studies show that existing PaI methods only able to find good layerwise sparsities not weights, as the discovered subnetworks are surprisingly resilient against layerwise random mask shuffling and weight re-initialization.
In this paper, we study PaI from a brand-new perspective -- the topology of subnetworks. In particular, we propose a principled framework for analyzing the performance of Pruning and Initialization (PaI) methods with two quantities, namely, the number of effective paths and effective nodes. These quantities allow for a more comprehensive understanding of PaI methods, giving us an accurate assessment of different subnetworks at initialization. We systematically analyze the behavior of various PaI methods through our framework and observe a guiding principle for constructing effective subnetworks: *at a specific sparsity, the top-performing subnetwork always presents a good balance between the number of effective nodes and the number of effective paths.*
Inspired by this observation, we present a novel data-agnostic pruning method by solving a multi-objective optimization problem. By conducting extensive experiments across different architectures and datasets, our results demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art PaI methods while it is able to discover subnetworks that have much lower inference FLOPs (up to 3.4$\times$). Code will be fully released. The-Anh Ta, Shiwei Liu 0003, Lichuan Xiang, Dung Le, Hongkai Wen 0001, Long Tran-Thanh |
NeurIPS | 4 |