Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stoil Ganev
dblp:294/9160
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Learning paradigms · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
likelihood-based learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Semi-supervised learning with a principled likelihood from a generative model of data curation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Semi-supervised learning with a principled likelihood from a generative model of data curation · ICLR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
likelihood estimation · 0.7generative modeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Semi-supervised learning with a principled likelihood from a generative model of data curation
Stoil Ganev, Laurence Aitchison |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Data augmentation in Bayesian neural networks and the cold posterior effectabstractBayesian neural networks that incorporate data augmentation implicitly use a “randomly perturbed log-likelihood [which] does not have a clean interpretation as a valid likelihood function” (Izmailov et al. 2021). Here, we provide several approaches to developing principled Bayesian neural networks incorporating data augmentation. We introduce a “finite orbit” setting which allows valid likelihoods to be computed exactly, and for the more usual “full orbit” setting we derive multi-sample bounds tighter than those used previously. These models cast light on the origin of the cold posterior effect. In particular, we find that the cold posterior effect persists even in these principled models incorporating data augmentation. This suggests that the cold posterior effect cannot be dismissed as an artifact of data augmentation using incorrect likelihoods. Seth Nabarro, Stoil Ganev, Adrià Garriga-Alonso, Vincent Fortuin, Mark van der Wilk, Laurence Aitchison |
UAI | 2 |