EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arshak Minasyan
dblp:294/9437
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 50% Learning theory · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › finite-sample analysis
finite-sample bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
Wasserstein GAN |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
push-forward maps · 0.8lipschitz constraint · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical DistributionabstractThis paper explores the problem of generative modeling, aiming to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples. While recent studies have focused on quantifying the statistical precision of popular algorithms, there is a lack of mathematical evaluation regarding the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model. We present theoretical insights into this aspect, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN, constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that not only avoid replication but also significantly deviate from the empirical distribution. Importantly, we show that left-invertibility achieves this without compromising the statistical optimality of the resulting generator. Our most important contribution provides a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one. We also establish a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one. Both bounds are explicit and show the impact of key parameters such as sample size, dimensions of the ambient and latent spaces, noise level, and smoothness measured by the Lipschitz constant. Elen Vardanyan, Sona Hunanyan, Tigran Galstyan, Arshak Minasyan, Arnak S. Dalalyan |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Matching Map Recovery with an Unknown Number of OutliersabstractWe consider the problem of finding the matching map between two sets of $d$-dimensional noisy feature-vectors. The distinctive feature of our setting is that we do not assume that all the vectors of the first set have their corresponding vector in the second set. If $n$ and $m$ are the sizes of these two sets, we assume that the matching map that should be recovered is defined on a subset of unknown cardinality $k^*\le \min(n,m)$. We show that, in the high-dimensional setting, if the signal-to-noise ratio is larger than $5(d\log(4nm/\alpha))^{1/4}$, then the true matching map can be recovered with probability $1-\alpha$. Interestingly, this threshold does not depend on $k^*$ and is the same as the one obtained in prior work in the case of $k = \min(n,m)$. The procedure for which the aforementioned property is proved is obtained by a data-driven selection among candidate mappings $\{\hat\pi_k:k\in[\min(n,m)]\}$. Each $\hat\pi_k$ minimizes the sum of squares of distances between two sets of size $k$. The resulting optimization problem can be formulated as a minimum-cost flow problem, and thus solved efficiently. Finally, we report the results of numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world data that illustrate our theoretical results and provide further insight into the properties of the algorithms studied in this work. Arshak Minasyan, Tigran Galstyan, Sona Hunanyan, Arnak S. Dalalyan |
AISTATS | 1 |