Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arjun Bhattacharya

dblp:295/2112 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1196-4385ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
power analysis
0.712023
twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.712023
twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › post-GWAS analysis
transcriptome-wide association study
0.712023
twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.212023
twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.212023
twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis
abstract
SUMMARY: Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified numerous genetic variants associated with complex disease risk; however, most of these associations are non-coding, complicating identifying their proximal target gene. Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) have been proposed to mitigate this gap by integrating expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data with GWAS data. Numerous methodological advancements have been made for TWAS, yet each approach requires ad hoc simulations to demonstrate feasibility. Here, we present twas_sim, a computationally scalable and easily extendable tool for simplified performance evaluation and power analysis for TWAS methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and documentation are available at https://github.com/mancusolab/twas_sim.
Zeyun Lu, Arjun Bhattacharya, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Nicholas Mancuso
Bioinform.3
2021 An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data
abstract
The NanoString RNA counting assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples is unique in its sensitivity, technical reproducibility and robustness for analysis of clinical and archival samples. While commercial normalization methods are provided by NanoString, they are not optimal for all settings, particularly when samples exhibit strong technical or biological variation or where housekeeping genes have variable performance across the cohort. Here, we develop and evaluate a more comprehensive normalization procedure for NanoString data with steps for quality control, selection of housekeeping targets, normalization and iterative data visualization and biological validation. The approach was evaluated using a large cohort ($N=\kern0.5em 1649$) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, two cohorts of moderate sample size ($N=359$ and$130$) and a small published dataset ($N=12$). The iterative process developed here eliminates technical variation (e.g. from different study phases or sites) more reliably than the three other methods, including NanoString's commercial package, without diminishing biological variation, especially in long-term longitudinal multiphase or multisite cohorts. We also find that probe sets validated for nCounter, such as the PAM50 gene signature, are impervious to batch issues. This work emphasizes that systematic quality control, normalization and visualization of NanoString nCounter data are an imperative component of study design that influences results in downstream analyses.
Arjun Bhattacharya, Alina M. Hamilton, Helena Furberg, Eugene Pietzak, Mark P. Purdue, Melissa A. Troester, Katherine A. Hoadley, Michael I. Love
Briefings Bioinform.1