Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arjun Bhattacharya
dblp:295/2112
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1196-4385ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
power analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › post-GWAS analysis
transcriptome-wide association study |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysis · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | twas_sim, a Python-based tool for simulation and power analysis of transcriptome-wide association analysisabstractSUMMARY: Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified numerous genetic variants associated with complex disease risk; however, most of these associations are non-coding, complicating identifying their proximal target gene. Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) have been proposed to mitigate this gap by integrating expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data with GWAS data. Numerous methodological advancements have been made for TWAS, yet each approach requires ad hoc simulations to demonstrate feasibility. Here, we present twas_sim, a computationally scalable and easily extendable tool for simplified performance evaluation and power analysis for TWAS methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and documentation are available at https://github.com/mancusolab/twas_sim. Zeyun Lu, Arjun Bhattacharya, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Nicholas Mancuso |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2021 | An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression dataabstractThe NanoString RNA counting assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples is unique in its sensitivity, technical reproducibility and robustness for analysis of clinical and archival samples. While commercial normalization methods are provided by NanoString, they are not optimal for all settings, particularly when samples exhibit strong technical or biological variation or where housekeeping genes have variable performance across the cohort. Here, we develop and evaluate a more comprehensive normalization procedure for NanoString data with steps for quality control, selection of housekeeping targets, normalization and iterative data visualization and biological validation. The approach was evaluated using a large cohort ($N=\kern0.5em 1649$) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, two cohorts of moderate sample size ($N=359$ and$130$) and a small published dataset ($N=12$). The iterative process developed here eliminates technical variation (e.g. from different study phases or sites) more reliably than the three other methods, including NanoString's commercial package, without diminishing biological variation, especially in long-term longitudinal multiphase or multisite cohorts. We also find that probe sets validated for nCounter, such as the PAM50 gene signature, are impervious to batch issues. This work emphasizes that systematic quality control, normalization and visualization of NanoString nCounter data are an imperative component of study design that influences results in downstream analyses. Arjun Bhattacharya, Alina M. Hamilton, Helena Furberg, Eugene Pietzak, Mark P. Purdue, Melissa A. Troester, Katherine A. Hoadley, Michael I. Love |
Briefings Bioinform. | 1 |