Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin J. Brown

dblp:295/4198 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8060-8109ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 87% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 67% Quantum computing and quantum information · 33%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture
0.812024
Codesign of quantum error-correcting codes and modular chiplets in the presence of defects · ASPLOS (2) 2024
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum error correction
0.812024
Codesign of quantum error-correcting codes and modular chiplets in the presence of defects · ASPLOS (2) 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error detection and correction
classical codes
0.512021
Correcting Spanning Errors With a Fractal Code · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
decoding algorithms
0.512021
Correcting Spanning Errors With a Fractal Code · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum error correction
0.512021
Correcting Spanning Errors With a Fractal Code · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
manufacturing defects
0.212024
Codesign of quantum error-correcting codes and modular chiplets in the presence of defects · ASPLOS (2) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantum error-correcting codes · 0.8modular architecture · 0.8numerical experiments · 0.5minimum-weight perfect matching · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Codesign of quantum error-correcting codes and modular chiplets in the presence of defects
abstract
Fabrication errors pose a significant challenge in scaling up solid-state quantum devices to the sizes required for fault-tolerant (FT) quantum applications. To mitigate the resource overhead caused by fabrication errors, we combine two approaches: (1) leveraging the flexibility of a modular architecture, (2) adapting the procedure of quantum error correction (QEC) to account for fabrication defects.
Sophia Fuhui Lin, Joshua Viszlai, Kaitlin N. Smith, Gokul Subramanian Ravi, Charles Yuan, Fred Chong, Benjamin J. Brown
ASPLOS (2)7
2021 Correcting Spanning Errors With a Fractal Code
abstract
The strongly correlated systems we use to realise quantum error-correcting codes may give rise to high-weight, problematic errors. Encouragingly, we can expect local quantum error-correcting codes with no string-like logical operators - such as the cubic code - to be robust to highly correlated, one-dimensional errors that span their lattice. The challenge remains to design decoding algorithms that utilise the high distance of these codes. Here, we begin the development of such algorithms by proposing an efficient decoder for the `Fibonacci code'; a two-dimensional classical code that mimics the fractal nature of the cubic code. Our iterative decoder finds a correction through repeated use of minimum-weight perfect matching by exploiting symmetries of the code. We perform numerical experiments that show our decoder is robust to one-dimensional, correlated errors. First, using a bit-flip noise model at low error rates, we find that our decoder demonstrates a logical failure rate that scales super exponentially in the linear size of the lattice. In contrast, a decoder that could not tolerate spanning errors would not achieve this rapid decay in failure rate with increasing system size. We also find a finite threshold using a spanning noise model that introduces string-like errors that stretch along full rows and columns of the lattice. These results provide direct evidence that our decoder is robust to one-dimensional, correlated errors that span the lattice.
Georgia M. Nixon, Benjamin J. Brown
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2