Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Till Kletti

dblp:295/4740 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-8853-4618ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 75% Recommender systems · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › fairness-aware recommendation
exposure fairness
1.122022
Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings · WSDM 2022
Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure Model · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › ranking › multi-objective ranking
fair ranking
1.122022
Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings · WSDM 2022
Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure Model · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval
ranking
1.122022
Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings · WSDM 2022
Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure Model · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.612022
Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure Model · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › user behavior › search behavior › click model
position-based model
0.612022
Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings · WSDM 2022
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.212022
Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings · WSDM 2022
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
pareto front
0.212022
Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings · WSDM 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming · 1.7carathéodory decomposition · 1.7quadratic programming · 1.1dynamic bayesian network · 0.6birkhoff-von-neumann decomposition · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure Model
abstract
In recent years, it has become clear that rankings delivered in many areas need not only be useful to the users but also respect fairness of exposure for the item producers. We consider the problem of finding ranking policies that achieve a Pareto-optimal tradeoff between these two aspects. Several methods were proposed to solve it; for instance a popular one is to use linear programming with a Birkhoff-von Neumann decomposition. These methods, however, are based on a classical Position Based exposure Model (PBM), which assumes independence between the items (hence the exposure only depends on the rank). In many applications, this assumption is unrealistic and the community increasingly moves towards considering other models that include dependences, such as the Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) exposure model. For such models, computing (exact) optimal fair ranking policies remains an open question. In this paper, we answer this question by leveraging a new geometrical method based on the so-called expohedron proposed recently for the PBM (Kletti et al., WSDM'22). We lay out the structure of a new geometrical object (the DBN-expohedron), and propose for it a Carathéodory decomposition algorithm of complexity $O(n^3)$, where n is the number of documents to rank. Such an algorithm enables expressing any feasible expected exposure vector as a distribution over at most n rankings; furthermore we show that we can compute the whole set of Pareto-optimal expected exposure vectors with the same complexity $O(n^3)$. Our work constitutes the first exact algorithm able to efficiently find a Pareto-optimal distribution of rankings. It is applicable to a broad range of fairness notions, including classical notions of meritocratic and demographic fairness. We empirically evaluate our method on the TREC2020 and MSLR datasets and compare it to several baselines in terms of Pareto-optimality and speed.
Till Kletti, Jean-Michel Renders, Patrick Loiseau
SIGIR1
2022 Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings
abstract
We consider the problem of computing a sequence of rankings that maximizes consumer-side utility while minimizing producer-side individual unfairness of exposure. While prior work has addressed this problem using linear or quadratic programs on bistochastic matrices, such approaches, relying on Birkhoff-von Neumann (BvN) decompositions, are too slow to be implemented at large scale. In this paper we introduce a geometrical object, a polytope that we call expohedron, whose points represent all achievable exposures of items for a Position Based Model (PBM). We exhibit some of its properties and lay out a Carathéodory decomposition algorithm with complexity $O(n^2łog(n))$ able to express any point inside the expohedron as a convex sum of at most n vertices, where n is the number of items to rank. Such a decomposition makes it possible to express any feasible target exposure as a distribution over at most n rankings. Furthermore we show that we can use this polytope to recover the whole Pareto frontier of the multi-objective fairness-utility optimization problem, using a simple geometrical procedure with complexity $O(n^2łog(n))$. Our approach compares favorably to linear or quadratic programming baselines in terms of algorithmic complexity and empirical runtime and is applicable to any merit that is a non-decreasing function of item relevance. Furthermore our solution can be expressed as a distribution over only $\ndoc$ permutations, instead of the $(n-1)^2 + 1$ achieved with BvN decompositions. We perform experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, confirming our theoretical results.
Till Kletti, Jean-Michel Renders, Patrick Loiseau
WSDM1