Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jacob C. Walker
dblp:295/5197
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 46% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Generative modeling · 8% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | SemPPL: Predicting Pseudo-Labels for Better Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2023 CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Investigating the Role of Model-Based Learning in Exploration and Transfer · ICML 2023 Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model-based planning
planning with learned models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Position: Video as the New Language for Real-World Decision Making · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
video generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Position: Video as the New Language for Real-World Decision Making · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Investigating the Role of Model-Based Learning in Exploration and Transfer · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pseudo-label estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SemPPL: Predicting Pseudo-Labels for Better Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
BERT-style pretraining |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › generalization in reinforcement learning
procedural generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
representation learning for reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
causal representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Representation Learning via Invariant Causal Mechanisms · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Representation Learning via Invariant Causal Mechanisms · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Investigating the Role of Model-Based Learning in Exploration and Transfer · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
planning · 1.3self-supervised learning · 1.2reinforcement learning · 0.8in-context learning · 0.8model-based learning · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.6BERT · 0.6invariant causal mechanisms · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Position: Video as the New Language for Real-World Decision MakingabstractBoth text and video data are abundant on the internet and support large-scale self-supervised learning through next token or frame prediction. However, they have not been equally leveraged: language models have had significant real-world impact, whereas video generation has remained largely limited to media entertainment. Yet video data captures important information about the physical world that is difficult to express in language. To address this gap, we discuss an under-appreciated opportunity to extend video generation to solve tasks in the real world. We observe how, akin to language, video can serve as a unified interface that can absorb internet knowledge and represent diverse tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate how, like language models, video generation can serve as planners, agents, compute engines, and environment simulators through techniques such as in-context learning, planning and reinforcement learning. We identify major impact opportunities in domains such as robotics, self-driving, and science, supported by recent work that demonstrates how such advanced capabilities in video generation are plausibly within reach. Lastly, we identify key challenges in video generation that mitigate progress. Addressing these challenges will enable video generation models to demonstrate unique value alongside language models in a wider array of AI applications. Sherry Yang 0001, Jacob C. Walker, Jack Parker-Holder, Yilun Du, Jake Bruce, André Barreto 0001, Pieter Abbeel, Dale Schuurmans |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | SemPPL: Predicting Pseudo-Labels for Better Contrastive Representations
Matko Bosnjak, Pierre H. Richemond, Nenad Tomasev, Florian Strub, Jacob C. Walker, Felix Hill, Lars Buesing, Razvan Pascanu, Charles Blundell, Jovana Mitrovic |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2023 | Investigating the Role of Model-Based Learning in Exploration and TransferabstractState of the art reinforcement learning has enabled training agents on tasks of ever increasing complexity. However, the current paradigm tends to favor training agents from scratch on every new task or on collections of tasks with a view towards generalizing to novel task configurations. The former suffers from poor data efficiency while the latter is difficult when test tasks are out-of-distribution. Agents that can effectively transfer their knowledge about the world pose a potential solution to these issues. In this paper, we investigate transfer learning in the context of model-based agents. Specifically, we aim to understand where exactly environment models have an advantage and why. We find that a model-based approach outperforms controlled model-free baselines for transfer learning. Through ablations, we show that both the policy and dynamics model learnt through exploration matter for successful transfer. We demonstrate our results across three domains which vary in their requirements for transfer: in-distribution procedural (Crafter), in-distribution identical (RoboDesk), and out-of-distribution (Meta-World). Our results show that intrinsic exploration combined with environment models present a viable direction towards agents that are self-supervised and able to generalize to novel reward functions. Jacob C. Walker, Eszter Vértes, Yazhe Li, Gabriel Dulac-Arnold, Ankesh Anand, Theophane Weber, Jessica B. Hamrick |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models
Ankesh Anand, Jacob C. Walker, Yazhe Li, Eszter Vértes, Julian Schrittwieser, Sherjil Ozair, Theophane Weber, Jessica B. Hamrick |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning
Andrea Banino, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Jacob C. Walker, Tim Scholtes, Jovana Mitrovic, Charles Blundell |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Representation Learning via Invariant Causal Mechanisms
Jovana Mitrovic, Brian McWilliams, Jacob C. Walker, Lars Buesing, Charles Blundell |
ICLR | 3 |