Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Konstantin-Klemens Lurz
dblp:295/5344
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 46% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience › neural coding
brain encoding models |
0.7 | 2 | 2023 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021 Bayesian Oracle for bounding information gain in neural encoding models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
generative appearance model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Taking the neural sampling code very seriously: A data-driven approach for evaluating generative models of the visual system · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bayesian Oracle for bounding information gain in neural encoding models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › biological vision modeling
visual cortex modeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural response modeling
neural system identification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
normalizing flow · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0neural system identification · 0.7deep generative model · 0.7bayesian oracle · 0.7bayesian inference · 0.7data-driven modeling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Bayesian Oracle for bounding information gain in neural encoding models
Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Mohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Fabian H. Sinz |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Taking the neural sampling code very seriously: A data-driven approach for evaluating generative models of the visual systemabstractPrevailing theories of perception hypothesize that the brain implements perception via Bayesian inference in a generative model of the world.
One prominent theory, the Neural Sampling Code (NSC), posits that neuronal responses to a stimulus represent samples from the posterior distribution over latent world state variables that cause the stimulus.
Although theoretically elegant, NSC does not specify the exact form of the generative model or prescribe how to link the theory to recorded neuronal activity.
Previous works assume simple generative models and test their qualitative agreement with neurophysiological data.
Currently, there is no precise alignment of the normative theory with neuronal recordings, especially in response to natural stimuli, and a quantitative, experimental evaluation of models under NSC has been lacking.
Here, we propose a novel formalization of NSC, that (a) allows us to directly fit NSC generative models to recorded neuronal activity in response to natural images, (b) formulate richer and more flexible generative models, and (c) employ standard metrics to quantitatively evaluate different generative models under NSC.
Furthermore, we derive a stimulus-conditioned predictive model of neuronal responses from the trained generative model using our formalization that we compare to neural system identification models.
We demonstrate our approach by fitting and comparing classical- and flexible deep learning-based generative models on population recordings from the macaque primary visual cortex (V1) to natural images, and show that the flexible models outperform classical models in both their generative- and predictive-model performance.
Overall, our work is an important step towards a quantitative evaluation of NSC.
It provides a framework that lets us \textit{learn} the generative model directly from neuronal population recordings, paving the way for an experimentally-informed understanding of probabilistic computational principles underlying perception and behavior. Suhas Shrinivasan, Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Kelli Restivo, George H. Denfield, Andreas S. Tolias, Edgar Y. Walker, Fabian H. Sinz |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex
Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Mohammad Bashiri, Konstantin Willeke, Akshay K. Jagadish, Edgar Y. Walker, Santiago A. Cadena, Taliah Muhammad, Erick Cobos, Andreas S. Tolias, Alexander S. Ecker, Fabian H. Sinz |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural imagesabstractWe present a joint deep neural system identification model for two major sources of neural variability: stimulus-driven and stimulus-conditioned fluctuations. To this end, we combine (1) state-of-the-art deep networks for stimulus-driven activity and (2) a flexible, normalizing flow-based generative model to capture the stimulus-conditioned variability including noise correlations. This allows us to train the model end-to-end without the need for sophisticated probabilistic approximations associated with many latent state models for stimulus-conditioned fluctuations. We train the model on the responses of thousands of neurons from multiple areas of the mouse visual cortex to natural images. We show that our model outperforms previous state-of-the-art models in predicting the distribution of neural population responses to novel stimuli, including shared stimulus-conditioned variability. Furthermore, it successfully learns known latent factors of the population responses that are related to behavioral variables such as pupil dilation, and other factors that vary systematically with brain area or retinotopic location. Overall, our model accurately accounts for two critical sources of neural variability while avoiding several complexities associated with many existing latent state models. It thus provides a useful tool for uncovering the interplay between different factors that contribute to variability in neural activity. Mohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Akshay K. Jagadish, Taliah Muhammad, Zhiwei Ding, Zhuokun Ding, Andreas S. Tolias, Fabian H. Sinz |
NeurIPS | 3 |