Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Burford
dblp:295/8424
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6794-2428ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating systems › i/o
i/o optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023 |
Operating systems › resource management
storage management |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
network file system |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023 |
Storage systems › storage management
storage optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving Storage Systems Using Machine Learning · ACM Trans. Storage 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 1.3kernel-level ML architecture · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Improving Storage Systems Using Machine LearningabstractOperating systems include many heuristic algorithms designed to improve overall storage performance and throughput. Because such heuristics cannot work well for all conditions and workloads, system designers resorted to exposing numerous tunable parameters to users—thus burdening users with continually optimizing their own storage systems and applications. Storage systems are usually responsible for most latency in I/O-heavy applications, so even a small latency improvement can be significant. Machine learning (ML) techniques promise to learn patterns, generalize from them, and enable optimal solutions that adapt to changing workloads. We propose that ML solutions become a first-class component in OSs and replace manual heuristics to optimize storage systems dynamically. In this article, we describe our proposed ML architecture, called KML. We developed a prototype KML architecture and applied it to two case studies: optimizing readahead and NFS read-size values. Our experiments show that KML consumes less than 4 KB of dynamic kernel memory, has a CPU overhead smaller than 0.2%, and yet can learn patterns and improve I/O throughput by as much as 2.3× and 15× for two case studies—even for complex, never-seen-before, concurrently running mixed workloads on different storage devices. Ibrahim Umit Akgun, Ali Selman Aydin, Andrew Burford, Michael McNeill, Michael Arkhangelskiy, Erez Zadok |
ACM Trans. Storage | 3 |