Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward J. Hu

dblp:295/8436 · also J. Edward Hu · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
5as first author
10since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5557-6790ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 5 first-author · 10 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
13 papers
Language models and text generation · 23% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 35, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks
2.032023
GFlowNet Foundations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
GFlowNet-EM for Learning Compositional Latent Variable Models · ICML 2023
GFlowNets and variational inference · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › overparameterized neural network
infinite-width neural networks
1.122022
Efficient Computation of Deep Nonlinear Infinite-Width Neural Networks that Learn Features · ICLR 2022
Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networks · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
amortized bayesian inference
0.812024
Amortizing intractable inference in large language models · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
constrained text generation
0.812024
Amortizing intractable inference in large language models · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning
0.812024
Amortizing intractable inference in large language models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › amortized inference
amortized variational inference
0.712023
GFlowNet-EM for Learning Compositional Latent Variable Models · ICML 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization
0.712023
Differentiable Tree Operations Promote Compositional Generalization · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
differentiable programming
0.712023
Differentiable Tree Operations Promote Compositional Generalization · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.712023
GFlowNet-EM for Learning Compositional Latent Variable Models · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
partition function estimation
0.712023
GFlowNet Foundations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference
0.712023
GFlowNet Foundations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.712023
GFlowNets and variational inference · ICLR 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation
0.612022
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation
0.612022
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.612022
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.512021
Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network parameterization
maximal update parameterization
0.512021
Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network parameterization
0.512021
Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel
0.512021
Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networks · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › hyperparameter transfer
zero-shot hyperparameter transfer
0.512021
Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.412020
Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizes · ICML 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
causal knowledge extraction
0.412020
Guided Generation of Cause and Effect · IJCAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
0.412020
Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizes · ICML 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
conditional text generation
0.412020
Guided Generation of Cause and Effect · IJCAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
randomized smoothing
0.412020
Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizes · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.412020
Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizes · ICML 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › constrained decoding
lexically constrained decoding
0.412019
PARABANK: Monolingual Bitext Generation and Sentential Paraphrasing via Lexically-Constrained Neural Machine Translation · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.412019
PARABANK: Monolingual Bitext Generation and Sentential Paraphrasing via Lexically-Constrained Neural Machine Translation · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
paraphrase generation
0.412019
PARABANK: Monolingual Bitext Generation and Sentential Paraphrasing via Lexically-Constrained Neural Machine Translation · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference
0.312018
Collecting Diverse Natural Language Inference Problems for Sentence Representation Evaluation · EMNLP 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.4generative flow networks · 0.8diversity-seeking fine-tuning · 0.8variational inference · 0.7markov chain monte carlo · 0.7external memory · 0.7expectation-maximization · 0.7differentiable tree interpreter · 0.7GFlowNets · 0.7GFlowNet sampling · 0.7lexically-constrained neural machine translation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Amortizing intractable inference in large language models
abstract
Autoregressive large language models (LLMs) compress knowledge from their training data through next-token conditional distributions. This limits tractable querying of this knowledge to start-to-end autoregressive sampling. However, many tasks of interest---including sequence continuation, infilling, and other forms of constrained generation---involve sampling from intractable posterior distributions. We address this limitation by using amortized Bayesian inference to sample from these intractable posteriors. Such amortization is algorithmically achieved by fine-tuning LLMs via diversity-seeking reinforcement learning algorithms: generative flow networks (GFlowNets). We empirically demonstrate that this distribution-matching paradigm of LLM fine-tuning can serve as an effective alternative to maximum-likelihood training and reward-maximizing policy optimization. As an important application, we interpret chain-of-thought reasoning as a latent variable modeling problem and demonstrate that our approach enables data-efficient adaptation of LLMs to tasks that require multi-step rationalization and tool use.
Edward J. Hu, Moksh Jain, Eric Elmoznino, Younesse Kaddar, Guillaume Lajoie, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin
ICLR1
2023 GFlowNets and variational inference
Nikolay Malkin, Salem Lahlou, Tristan Deleu, Edward J. Hu, Katie Everett, Dinghuai Zhang, Yoshua Bengio
ICLR5
2023 GFlowNet-EM for Learning Compositional Latent Variable Models
abstract
Latent variable models (LVMs) with discrete compositional latents are an important but challenging setting due to a combinatorially large number of possible configurations of the latents. A key tradeoff in modeling the posteriors over latents is between expressivity and tractable optimization. For algorithms based on expectation-maximization (EM), the E-step is often intractable without restrictive approximations to the posterior. We propose the use of GFlowNets, algorithms for sampling from an unnormalized density by learning a stochastic policy for sequential construction of samples, for this intractable E-step. By training GFlowNets to sample from the posterior over latents, we take advantage of their strengths as amortized variational inference algorithms for complex distributions over discrete structures. Our approach, GFlowNet-EM, enables the training of expressive LVMs with discrete compositional latents, as shown by experiments on non-context-free grammar induction and on images using discrete variational autoencoders (VAEs) without conditional independence enforced in the encoder.
Edward J. Hu, Nikolay Malkin, Moksh Jain, Katie Everett, Alexandros Graikos, Yoshua Bengio
ICML1
2023 Differentiable Tree Operations Promote Compositional Generalization
abstract
In the context of structure-to-structure transformation tasks, learning sequences of discrete symbolic operations poses significant challenges due to their non-differentiability. To facilitate the learning of these symbolic sequences, we introduce a differentiable tree interpreter that compiles high-level symbolic tree operations into subsymbolic matrix operations on tensors. We present a novel Differentiable Tree Machine (DTM) architecture that integrates our interpreter with an external memory and an agent that learns to sequentially select tree operations to execute the target transformation in an end-to-end manner. With respect to out-of-distribution compositional generalization on synthetic semantic parsing and language generation tasks, DTM achieves 100% while existing baselines such as Transformer, Tree Transformer, LSTM, and Tree2Tree LSTM achieve less than 30%. DTM remains highly interpretable in addition to its perfect performance.
Paul Soulos, Edward J. Hu, Kate McCurdy, Yunmo Chen, Roland Fernandez, Paul Smolensky, Jianfeng Gao 0001
ICML2
2023 GFlowNet Foundations
abstract
Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) have been introduced as a method to sample a diverse set of candidates in an active learning context, with a training objective that makes them approximately sample in proportion to a given reward function. In this paper, we show a number of additional theoretical properties of GFlowNets, including a new local and efficient training objective called detailed balance for the analogy with MCMC. GFlowNets can be used to estimate joint probability distributions and the corresponding marginal distributions where some variables are unspecified and, of particular interest, can represent distributions over composite objects like sets and graphs. GFlowNets amortize the work typically done by computationally expensive MCMC methods in a single but trained generative pass. They could also be used to estimate partition functions and free energies, conditional probabilities of supersets (supergraphs) given a subset (subgraph), as well as marginal distributions over all supersets (supergraphs) of a given set (graph). We introduce variations enabling the estimation of entropy and mutual information, continuous actions and modular energy functions.
Yoshua Bengio, Salem Lahlou, Tristan Deleu, Edward J. Hu, Mo Tiwari, Emmanuel Bengio
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2022 LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Weizhu Chen
ICLR1
2022 Efficient Computation of Deep Nonlinear Infinite-Width Neural Networks that Learn Features
Greg Yang, Michael Santacroce, Edward J. Hu
ICLR3
2021 Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networks
abstract
As its width tends to infinity, a deep neural network’s behavior under gradient descent can become simplified and predictable (e.g. given by the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK)), if it is parametrized appropriately (e.g. the NTK parametrization). However, we show that the standard and NTK parametrizations of a neural network do not admit infinite-width limits that can *learn* features, which is crucial for pretraining and transfer learning such as with BERT. We propose simple modifications to the standard parametrization to allow for feature learning in the limit. Using the *Tensor Programs* technique, we derive explicit formulas for such limits. On Word2Vec and few-shot learning on Omniglot via MAML, two canonical tasks that rely crucially on feature learning, we compute these limits exactly. We find that they outperform both NTK baselines and finite-width networks, with the latter approaching the infinite-width feature learning performance as width increases.
Greg Yang, Edward J. Hu
ICML2
2021 Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer
abstract
Hyperparameter (HP) tuning in deep learning is an expensive process, prohibitively so for neural networks (NNs) with billions of parameters.We show that, in the recently discovered Maximal Update Parametrization ($\mu$P), many optimal HPs remain stable even as model size changes. This leads to a new HP tuning paradigm we call *$\mu$Transfer*: parametrize the target model in $\mu$P, tune the HP indirectly on a smaller model, and *zero-shot transfer* them to the full-sized model, i.e., without directly tuning the latter at all.We verify $\mu$Transfer on Transformer and ResNet. For example, 1) by transferring pretraining HPs from a model of 13M parameters, we outperform published numbers of BERT-large (350M parameters), with a total tuning cost equivalent to pretraining BERT-large once; 2) by transferring from 40M parameters, we outperform published numbers of the 6.7B GPT-3 model, with tuning cost only 7% of total pretraining cost. A Pytorch implementation of our technique can be found at github.com/microsoft/mup. See arxiv.org for the full, up-to-date version of this work.
Edward J. Hu, Igor Babuschkin, Szymon Sidor, Xiaodong Liu 0003, David Farhi, Nick Ryder, Jakub Pachocki, Weizhu Chen, Jianfeng Gao 0001
NeurIPS2
2021 Iterative Paraphrastic Augmentation with Discriminative Span Alignment
abstract
Abstract We introduce a novel paraphrastic augmentation strategy based on sentence-level lexically constrained paraphrasing and discriminative span alignment. Our approach allows for the large-scale expansion of existing datasets or the rapid creation of new datasets using a small, manually produced seed corpus. We demonstrate our approach with experiments on the Berkeley FrameNet Project, a large-scale language understanding effort spanning more than two decades of human labor. With four days of training data collection for a span alignment model and one day of parallel compute, we automatically generate and release to the community 495,300 unique (Frame,Trigger) pairs in diverse sentential contexts, a roughly 50-fold expansion atop FrameNet v1.7. The resulting dataset is intrinsically and extrinsically evaluated in detail, showing positive results on a downstream task.
Ryan Culkin, Edward J. Hu, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Guanghui Qin, Benjamin Van Durme
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2020 Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizes
abstract
Randomized smoothing is the current state-of-the-art defense with provable robustness against $\ell_2$ adversarial attacks. Many works have devised new randomized smoothing schemes for other metrics, such as $\ell_1$ or $\ell_\infty$; however, substantial effort was needed to derive such new guarantees. This begs the question: can we find a general theory for randomized smoothing? We propose a novel framework for devising and analyzing randomized smoothing schemes, and validate its effectiveness in practice. Our theoretical contributions are: (1) we show that for an appropriate notion of "optimal", the optimal smoothing distributions for any "nice" norms have level sets given by the norm’s *Wulff Crystal*; (2) we propose two novel and complementary methods for deriving provably robust radii for any smoothing distribution; and, (3) we show fundamental limits to current randomized smoothing techniques via the theory of *Banach space cotypes*. By combining (1) and (2), we significantly improve the state-of-the-art certified accuracy in $\ell_1$ on standard datasets. Meanwhile, we show using (3) that with only label statistics under random input perturbations, randomized smoothing cannot achieve nontrivial certified accuracy against perturbations of $\ell_p$-norm $\Omega(\min(1, d^{\frac{1}{p} - \frac{1}{2}}))$, when the input dimension $d$ is large. We provide code in github.com/tonyduan/rs4a.
Greg Yang, Tony Duan, Edward J. Hu, Hadi Salman, Ilya P. Razenshteyn, Jerry Li 0001
ICML3
2020 Guided Generation of Cause and Effect
abstract
We present a conditional text generation framework that posits sentential expressions of possible causes and effects. This framework depends on two novel resources we develop in the course of this work: a very large-scale collection of English sentences expressing causal patterns (CausalBank); and a refinement over previous work on constructing large lexical causal knowledge graphs (Cause Effect Graph). Further, we extend prior work in lexically-constrained decoding to support disjunctive positive constraints. Human assessment confirms that our approach gives high-quality and diverse outputs. Finally, we use CausalBank to perform continued training of an encoder supporting a recent state-of-the-art model for causal reasoning, leading to a 3-point improvement on the COPA challenge set, with no change in model architecture.
Ting Liu 0001, Edward J. Hu, Benjamin Van Durme
IJCAI4
2019 PARABANK: Monolingual Bitext Generation and Sentential Paraphrasing via Lexically-Constrained Neural Machine Translation
abstract
We present PARABANK, a large-scale English paraphrase dataset that surpasses prior work in both quantity and quality. Following the approach of PARANMT (Wieting and Gimpel, 2018), we train a Czech-English neural machine translation (NMT) system to generate novel paraphrases of English reference sentences. By adding lexical constraints to the NMT decoding procedure, however, we are able to produce multiple high-quality sentential paraphrases per source sentence, yielding an English paraphrase resource with more than 4 billion generated tokens and exhibiting greater lexical diversity. Using human judgments, we also demonstrate that PARABANK’s paraphrases improve over PARANMT on both semantic similarity and fluency. Finally, we use PARABANK to train a monolingual NMT model with the same support for lexically-constrained decoding for sentence rewriting tasks.
Edward J. Hu, Rachel Rudinger, Matt Post, Benjamin Van Durme
AAAI1
2019 Large-Scale, Diverse, Paraphrastic Bitexts via Sampling and Clustering
abstract
Producing diverse paraphrases of a sentence is a challenging task.Natural paraphrase corpora are scarce and limited, while existing large-scale resources are automatically generated via back-translation and rely on beam search, which tends to lack diversity.We describe PARABANK 2, a new resource that contains multiple diverse sentential paraphrases, produced from a bilingual corpus using negative constraints, inference sampling, and clustering.We show that PARABANK 2 significantly surpasses prior work in both lexical and syntactic diversity while being meaningpreserving, as measured by human judgments and standardized metrics.Further, we illustrate how such paraphrastic resources may be used to refine contextualized encoders, leading to improvements in downstream tasks.
Edward J. Hu, Nils Holzenberger, Matt Post, Benjamin Van Durme
CoNLL1
2018 Collecting Diverse Natural Language Inference Problems for Sentence Representation Evaluation
abstract
Adam Poliak, Aparajita Haldar, Rachel Rudinger, J. Edward Hu, Ellie Pavlick, Aaron Steven White, Benjamin Van Durme. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018.
Adam Poliak, Aparajita Haldar, Rachel Rudinger, Edward J. Hu, Ellie Pavlick, Aaron Steven White, Benjamin Van Durme
EMNLP4