Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Aviva Prins

dblp:295/9033 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-4561-0314ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair resource allocation
0.712023
Planning to Fairly Allocate: Probabilistic Fairness in the Restless Bandit Setting · KDD 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
restless bandits
0.712023
Planning to Fairly Allocate: Probabilistic Fairness in the Restless Bandit Setting · KDD 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

whittle index · 1.3upper confidence bound · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Planning to Fairly Allocate: Probabilistic Fairness in the Restless Bandit Setting
abstract
Restless and collapsing bandits are often used to model budget-constrained resource allocation in settings where arms have action-dependent transition probabilities, such as the allocation of health interventions among patients. However, SOTA Whittle-index-based approaches to this planning problem either do not consider fairness among arms, or incentivize fairness without guaranteeing it. We thus introduce ProbFair, a probabilistically fair policy that maximizes total expected reward and satisfies the budget constraint while ensuring a strictly positive lower bound on the probability of being pulled at each timestep. We evaluate our algorithm on a real-world application, where interventions support continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy adherence among patients, as well as on a broader class of synthetic transition matrices. We find that ProbFair preserves utility while providing fairness guarantees.
Christine Herlihy, Aviva Prins, Aravind Srinivasan, John Dickerson 0001
KDD2