EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hamed Shirzad
dblp:295/9054
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 45% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph transformer |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Even Sparser Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024 Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
sparse attention |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Even Sparser Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024 Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for Graphs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph compression
graph sparsification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Even Sparser Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Even Sparser Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Evaluating Graph Generative Models with Contrastively Learned Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Evaluating Graph Generative Models with Contrastively Learned Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Evaluating Graph Generative Models with Contrastively Learned Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse attention · 0.8graph transformer · 0.8virtual global nodes · 0.7expander graph · 0.7graph substructure network · 0.6graph neural network · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Even Sparser Graph TransformersabstractGraph Transformers excel in long-range dependency modeling, but generally require quadratic memory complexity in the number of nodes in an input graph, and hence have trouble scaling to large graphs. Sparse attention variants such as Exphormer can help, but may require high-degree augmentations to the input graph for good performance, and do not attempt to sparsify an already-dense input graph. As the learned attention mechanisms tend to use few of these edges, however, such high-degree connections may be unnecessary. We show (empirically and with theoretical backing) that attention scores on graphs are usually quite consistent across network widths, and use this observation to propose a two-stage procedure, which we call Spexphormer: first, train a narrow network on the full augmented graph. Next, use only the active connections to train a wider network on a much sparser graph. We establish theoretical conditions when a narrow network's attention scores can match those of a wide network, and show that Spexphormer achieves good performance with drastically reduced memory requirements on various graph datasets. Hamed Shirzad, Honghao Lin, Balaji Venkatachalam, Ameya Velingker, David P. Woodruff, Danica J. Sutherland |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Exphormer: Sparse Transformers for GraphsabstractGraph transformers have emerged as a promising architecture for a variety of graph learning and representation tasks. Despite their successes, though, it remains challenging to scale graph transformers to large graphs while maintaining accuracy competitive with message-passing networks. In this paper, we introduce Exphormer, a framework for building powerful and scalable graph transformers. Exphormer consists of a sparse attention mechanism based on two mechanisms: virtual global nodes and expander graphs, whose mathematical characteristics, such as spectral expansion, pseduorandomness, and sparsity, yield graph transformers with complexity only linear in the size of the graph, while allowing us to prove desirable theoretical properties of the resulting transformer models. We show that incorporating Exphormer into the recently-proposed GraphGPS framework produces models with competitive empirical results on a wide variety of graph datasets, including state-of-the-art results on three datasets. We also show that Exphormer can scale to datasets on larger graphs than shown in previous graph transformer architectures. Hamed Shirzad, Ameya Velingker, Balaji Venkatachalam, Danica J. Sutherland, Ali Kemal Sinop |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | TD-GEN: Graph Generation Using Tree DecompositionabstractWe propose TD-GEN, a graph generation framework based on tree decomposition, and introduce a reduced upper bound on the maximum number of decisions needed for graph generation. The framework includes a permutation invariant tree generation model which forms the backbone of graph generation. Tree nodes are supernodes, each representing a cluster of nodes in the graph. Graph nodes and edges are incrementally generated inside the clusters by traversing the tree supernodes, respecting the structure of the tree decomposition, and following node sharing decisions between the clusters. Further, we discuss the shortcomings of the standard evaluation criteria based on statistical properties of the generated graphs. We propose to compare the generalizability of models based on expected likelihood. Empirical results on a variety of standard graph generation datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method. Hamed Shirzad, Hossein Hajimirsadeghi, Amir H. Abdi, Greg Mori |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2022 | Evaluating Graph Generative Models with Contrastively Learned FeaturesabstractA wide range of models have been proposed for Graph Generative Models, necessitating effective methods to evaluate their quality. So far, most techniques use either traditional metrics based on subgraph counting, or the representations of randomly initialized Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). We propose using representations from constrastively trained GNNs, rather than random GNNs, and show this gives more reliable evaluation metrics. Neither traditional approaches nor GNN-based approaches dominate the other, however: we give examples of graphs that each approach is unable to distinguish. We demonstrate that Graph Substructure Networks (GSNs), which in a way combine both approaches, are better at distinguishing the distances between graph datasets. Hamed Shirzad, Kaveh Hassani, Danica J. Sutherland |
NeurIPS | 1 |