Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert K. Claus
dblp:295/9123
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 91% Database system architecture and tuning · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control › locking
predicate locking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Database Isolation By Scheduling · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
transaction isolation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Database Isolation By Scheduling · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
transaction scheduling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Database Isolation By Scheduling · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
predicate locking optimization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Database Isolation By SchedulingabstractTransaction isolation is conventionally achieved by restricting access to the physical items in a database. To maximize performance, isolation functionality is often packaged with recovery, I/O, and data access methods in a monolithic transactional storage manager. While this design has historically afforded high performance in online transaction processing systems, industry trends indicate a growing need for a new approach in which intertwined components of the transactional storage manager are disaggregated into modular services. This paper presents a new method to modularize the isolation component. Our work builds on predicate locking, an isolation mechanism that enables this modularization by locking logical rather than physical items in a database. Predicate locking is rarely used as the core isolation mechanism because of its high theoretical complexity and perceived overhead. However, we show that this overhead can be substantially reduced in practice by optimizing for common predicate structures. We present DIBS, a transaction scheduler that employs our predicate locking optimizations to guarantee isolation as a modular service. We evaluate the performance of DIBS as the sole isolation mechanism in a data processing system. In this setting, DIBS scales up to 10.5 million transactions per second on a TATP workload. We also explore how DIBS can be applied to existing database systems to increase transaction throughput. DIBS reduces per-transaction file system writes by 90% on TATP in SQLite, resulting in a 3X improvement in throughput. Finally, DIBS reduces row contention on YCSB in MySQL, providing serializable isolation with a 1.4X improvement in throughput. Kevin P. Gaffney, Robert K. Claus, Jignesh M. Patel |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |