EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cédric Rommel
dblp:295/9766
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Medical and health informatics · 50% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Deep invariant networks with differentiable augmentation layers · NeurIPS 2022 CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signals · ICLR 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d human pose estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ManiPose: Manifold-Constrained Multi-Hypothesis 3D Human Pose Estimation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
conditional density estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimators · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ManiPose: Manifold-Constrained Multi-Hypothesis 3D Human Pose Estimation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimators · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
winner-takes-all |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimators · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
differentiable data augmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signals · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › out-of-distribution generalization
invariant learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep invariant networks with differentiable augmentation layers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
learned data augmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep invariant networks with differentiable augmentation layers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Medical and health informatics
EEG analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signals · ICLR 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signals · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
winner-takes-all training · 0.8regression · 0.8manifold learning · 0.8centroidal voronoi tessellation · 0.8differentiable augmentation · 0.6bi-level optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Winner-takes-all learners are geometry-aware conditional density estimatorsabstractWinner-takes-all training is a simple learning paradigm, which handles ambiguous tasks by predicting a set of plausible hypotheses. Recently, a connection was established between Winner-takes-all training and centroidal Voronoi tessellations, showing that, once trained, hypotheses should quantize optimally the shape of the conditional distribution to predict. However, the best use of these hypotheses for uncertainty quantification is still an open question. In this work, we show how to leverage the appealing geometric properties of the Winner-takes-all learners for conditional density estimation, without modifying its original training scheme. We theoretically establish the advantages of our novel estimator both in terms of quantization and density estimation, and we demonstrate its competitiveness on synthetic and real-world datasets, including audio data. Victor Letzelter, David Perera, Cédric Rommel, Mathieu Fontaine 0002, Slim Essid, Gaël Richard, Patrick Pérez |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | ManiPose: Manifold-Constrained Multi-Hypothesis 3D Human Pose EstimationabstractWe propose ManiPose, a manifold-constrained multi-hypothesis model for human-pose 2D-to-3D lifting. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence that, due to the depth ambiguity inherent to monocular 3D human pose estimation, traditional regression models suffer from pose-topology consistency issues, which standard evaluation metrics (MPJPE, P-MPJPE and PCK) fail to assess. ManiPose addresses depth ambiguity by proposing multiple candidate 3D poses for each 2D input, each with its estimated plausibility. Unlike previous multi-hypothesis approaches, ManiPose forgoes generative models, greatly facilitating its training and usage. By constraining the outputs to lie on the human pose manifold, ManiPose guarantees the consistency of all hypothetical poses, in contrast to previous works. We showcase the performance of ManiPose on real-world datasets, where it outperforms state-of-the-art models in pose consistency by a large margin while being very competitive on the MPJPE metric. Cédric Rommel, Victor Letzelter, Nermin Samet, Renaud Marlet, Matthieu Cord, Patrick Pérez, Eduardo Valle |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signals
Cédric Rommel, Thomas Moreau 0001, Joseph Paillard, Alexandre Gramfort |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Deep invariant networks with differentiable augmentation layersabstractDesigning learning systems which are invariant to certain data transformations is critical in machine learning. Practitioners can typically enforce a desired invariance on the trained model through the choice of a network architecture, e.g. using convolutions for translations, or using data augmentation. Yet, enforcing true invariance in the network can be difficult, and data invariances are not always known a piori. State-of-the-art methods for learning data augmentation policies require held-out data and are based on bilevel optimization problems, which are complex to solve and often computationally demanding. In this work we investigate new ways of learning invariances only from the training data. Using learnable augmentation layers built directly in the network, we demonstrate that our method is very versatile. It can incorporate any type of differentiable augmentation and be applied to a broad class of learning problems beyond computer vision. We provide empirical evidence showing that our approach is easier and faster to train than modern automatic data augmentation techniques based on bilevel optimization, while achieving comparable results. Experiments show that while the invariances transferred to a model through automatic data augmentation are limited by the model expressivity, the invariance yielded by our approach is insensitive to it by design. Cédric Rommel, Thomas Moreau 0001, Alexandre Gramfort |
NeurIPS | 1 |