Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Bertoin
dblp:295/9900
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3858-3881ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 82% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 3% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
robust MDP |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Constrained Robust MDPs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Constrained Robust MDPs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
data augmentation for reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Local Feature Swapping for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
generalization in reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Local Feature Swapping for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning › visual reinforcement learning
generalization in visual reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning
visual reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Numerical influence of ReLU'(0) on backpropagation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Constrained Robust MDPs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rectangularity relaxation · 0.8correlated disturbance modeling · 0.8soft actor-critic · 0.6saliency guidance · 0.6q-network · 0.6local feature swapping · 0.6stochastic gradient descent · 0.5batch normalization · 0.5backpropagation · 0.5adam · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Time-Constrained Robust MDPsabstractRobust reinforcement learning is essential for deploying reinforcement learning algorithms in real-world scenarios where environmental uncertainty predominates.
Traditional robust reinforcement learning often depends on rectangularity assumptions, where adverse probability measures of outcome states are assumed to be independent across different states and actions.
This assumption, rarely fulfilled in practice, leads to overly conservative policies.
To address this problem, we introduce a new time-constrained robust MDP (TC-RMDP) formulation that considers multifactorial, correlated, and time-dependent disturbances, thus more accurately reflecting real-world dynamics. This formulation goes beyond the conventional rectangularity paradigm, offering new perspectives and expanding the analytical framework for robust RL.
We propose three distinct algorithms, each using varying levels of environmental information, and evaluate them extensively on continuous control benchmarks.
Our results demonstrate that these algorithms yield an efficient tradeoff between performance and robustness, outperforming traditional deep robust RL methods in time-constrained environments while preserving robustness in classical benchmarks.
This study revisits the prevailing assumptions in robust RL and opens new avenues for developing more practical and realistic RL applications. Adil Zouitine, David Bertoin, Pierre Clavier, Matthieu Geist, Emmanuel Rachelson |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Disentanglement by Cyclic ReconstructionabstractDeep neural networks have demonstrated their ability to automatically extract meaningful features from data. However, in supervised learning, information specific to the dataset used for training, but irrelevant to the task at hand, may remain encoded in the extracted representations. This remaining information introduces a domain-specific bias, weakening the generalization performance. In this work, we propose splitting the information into a task-related representation and its complementary context representation. We propose an original method, combining adversarial feature predictors and cyclic reconstruction, to disentangle these two representations in the single-domain supervised case. We then adapt this method to the unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) problem, consisting of training a model capable of performing on both a source and a target domain. In particular, our method promotes disentanglement in the target domain, despite the absence of training labels. This enables the isolation of task-specific information from both domains and a projection into a common representation. The task-specific representation allows the efficient transfer of knowledge acquired from the source domain to the target domain. In the single-domain case, we demonstrate the quality of our representations on information retrieval tasks and the generalization benefits induced by sharpened task-specific representations. We then validate the proposed method on several classical domain adaptation (DA) benchmarks and illustrate the benefits of disentanglement for DA. David Bertoin, Emmanuel Rachelson |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 1 |
| 2022 | Local Feature Swapping for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
David Bertoin, Emmanuel Rachelson |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Look where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement LearningabstractDeep reinforcement learning policies, despite their outstanding efficiency in simulated visual control tasks, have shown disappointing ability to generalize across disturbances in the input training images. Changes in image statistics or distracting background elements are pitfalls that prevent generalization and real-world applicability of such control policies.We elaborate on the intuition that a good visual policy should be able to identify which pixels are important for its decision, and preserve this identification of important sources of information across images. This implies that training of a policy with small generalization gap should focus on such important pixels and ignore the others. This leads to the introduction of saliency-guided Q-networks (SGQN), a generic method for visual reinforcement learning, that is compatible with any value function learning method. SGQN vastly improves the generalization capability of Soft Actor-Critic agents and outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on the Deepmind Control Generalization benchmark, setting a new reference in terms of training efficiency, generalization gap, and policy interpretability. David Bertoin, Adil Zouitine, Mehdi Zouitine, Emmanuel Rachelson |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Numerical influence of ReLU'(0) on backpropagationabstractIn theory, the choice of ReLU(0) in [0, 1] for a neural network has a negligible influence both on backpropagation and training. Yet, in the real world, 32 bits default precision combined with the size of deep learning problems makes it a hyperparameter of training methods. We investigate the importance of the value of ReLU'(0) for several precision levels (16, 32, 64 bits), on various networks (fully connected, VGG, ResNet) and datasets (MNIST, CIFAR10, SVHN, ImageNet). We observe considerable variations of backpropagation outputs which occur around half of the time in 32 bits precision. The effect disappears with double precision, while it is systematic at 16 bits. For vanilla SGD training, the choice ReLU'(0) = 0 seems to be the most efficient. For our experiments on ImageNet the gain in test accuracy over ReLU'(0) = 1 was more than 10 points (two runs). We also evidence that reconditioning approaches as batch-norm or ADAM tend to buffer the influence of ReLU'(0)’s value. Overall, the message we convey is that algorithmic differentiation of nonsmooth problems potentially hides parameters that could be tuned advantageously. David Bertoin, Jérôme Bolte, Sébastien Gerchinovitz, Edouard Pauwels |
NeurIPS | 1 |