Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mihaela Catalina Stoian
dblp:296/1668 · also Mihaela C. Stoian
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 55% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
constrained generation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Beyond the convexity assumption: Realistic tabular data generation under quantifier-free real linear constraints · ICLR 2025 How Realistic Is Your Synthetic Data? Constraining Deep Generative Models for Tabular Data · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
tabular data generation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Beyond the convexity assumption: Realistic tabular data generation under quantifier-free real linear constraints · ICLR 2025 How Realistic Is Your Synthetic Data? Constraining Deep Generative Models for Tabular Data · ICLR 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning › data generation
synthetic data generation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Beyond the convexity assumption: Realistic tabular data generation under quantifier-free real linear constraints · ICLR 2025 How Realistic Is Your Synthetic Data? Constraining Deep Generative Models for Tabular Data · ICLR 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning › data generation › synthetic data generation
tabular data synthesis |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Beyond the convexity assumption: Realistic tabular data generation under quantifier-free real linear constraints · ICLR 2025 How Realistic Is Your Synthetic Data? Constraining Deep Generative Models for Tabular Data · ICLR 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Learning with Logical Constraints · IJCAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantifier-free linear constraints · 1.7disjunctive refinement layer · 1.7deep learning · 1.5deep generative model · 1.5constraint layer · 1.5pytorch · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Beyond the convexity assumption: Realistic tabular data generation under quantifier-free real linear constraintsabstractSynthetic tabular data generation has traditionally been a challenging problem due to the high complexity of the underlying distributions that characterise this type of data. Despite recent advances in deep generative models (DGMs), existing methods often fail to produce realistic datapoints that are well-aligned with available background knowledge.
In this paper, we address this limitation by introducing Disjunctive Refinement Layer (DRL), a novel layer designed
to enforce the alignment of generated data with the background knowledge specified in user-defined constraints.
DRL is the first method able to automatically make deep learning models inherently compliant with constraints as expressive as quantifier-free linear formulas, which can define non-convex and even disconnected spaces.
Our experimental analysis shows that DRL not only guarantees constraint satisfaction but also improves efficacy in downstream tasks. Notably, when applied to DGMs that frequently violate constraints, DRL eliminates violations entirely. Further, it improves performance metrics by up to 21.4\% in F1-score and 20.9\% in Area Under the ROC Curve, thus demonstrating its practical impact on data generation. Mihaela Catalina Stoian, Eleonora Giunchiglia |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | How Realistic Is Your Synthetic Data? Constraining Deep Generative Models for Tabular DataabstractDeep Generative Models (DGMs) have been shown to be powerful tools for generating tabular data, as they have been increasingly able to capture the complex distributions that characterize them. However, to generate realistic synthetic data, it is often not enough to have a good approximation of their distribution, as it also requires compliance with constraints that encode essential background knowledge on the problem at hand. In this paper, we address this limitation and show how DGMs for tabular data can be transformed into Constrained Deep Generative Models (C-DGMs), whose generated samples are guaranteed to be compliant with the given constraints. This is achieved by automatically parsing the constraints and transforming them into a Constraint Layer (CL) seamlessly integrated with the DGM. Our extensive experimental analysis with various DGMs and tasks reveals that standard DGMs often violate constraints, some exceeding 95% non-compliance, while their corresponding C-DGMs are never non-compliant. Then, we quantitatively demonstrate that, at training time, C-DGMs are able to exploit the background knowledge expressed by the constraints to outperform their standard counterparts with up to 4.5% improvement in utility and detection. Further, we show how our CL does not necessarily need to be integrated at training time, as it can be also used as a guardrail at inference time, still producing some improvements in the overall performance of the models. Finally, we show that our CL does not hinder the sample generation time of the models. Mihaela Catalina Stoian, Salijona Dyrmishi, Maxime Cordy, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Eleonora Giunchiglia |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Deep Learning with Requirements in the Real World
Mihaela Catalina Stoian |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | PiShield: A PyTorch Package for Learning with Requirements
Mihaela Catalina Stoian, Alex Tatomir, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Eleonora Giunchiglia |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | CCN+: A neuro-symbolic framework for deep learning with requirementsabstractFor their outstanding ability of finding hidden patterns in data, deep learning models have been extensively applied in many different domains. However, recent works have shown that, if a set of requirements expressing inherent knowledge about the problem at hand is given, then neural networks often fail to comply with them. This represents a major drawback for deep learning models, as requirements compliance is normally considered a necessary condition for standard software deployment. In this paper, we propose a novel neuro-symbolic framework able to make any neural network compliant by design to a given set of requirements over the output space expressed in full propositional logic. This framework, called CCN+, integrates the requirements into the output layer of the neural network by applying multiple inference rules that ensure compliance with the requirements and adapts the standard binary cross-entropy loss function to the requirement output layer. As a result, not only the outputted predictions are guaranteed to be compliant with the requirements, but the neural network itself learns how to exploit the domain knowledge expressed by the requirements to get better performance. We conduct an extensive experimental evaluation of CCN+ on 19 real-world multi-label classification datasets with propositional logic requirements, including a challenging dataset for autonomous driving. Our experimental analysis confirms that CCN+ is able to outperform both its neural counterparts and the state-of-the-art models. Eleonora Giunchiglia, Alex Tatomir, Mihaela Catalina Stoian, Thomas Lukasiewicz |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 3 |
| 2023 | ROAD-R: the autonomous driving dataset with logical requirementsabstractAbstract Neural networks have proven to be very powerful at computer vision tasks. However, they often exhibit unexpected behaviors, acting against background knowledge about the problem at hand. This calls for models (i) able to learn from requirements expressing such background knowledge, and (ii) guaranteed to be compliant with the requirements themselves. Unfortunately, the development of such models is hampered by the lack of real-world datasets equipped with formally specified requirements. In this paper, we introduce the ROad event Awareness Dataset with logical Requirements (ROAD-R), the first publicly available dataset for autonomous driving with requirements expressed as logical constraints. Given ROAD-R, we show that current state-of-the-art models often violate its logical constraints, and that it is possible to exploit them to create models that (i) have a better performance, and (ii) are guaranteed to be compliant with the requirements themselves. Eleonora Giunchiglia, Mihaela Catalina Stoian, Salman Khan 0004, Fabio Cuzzolin, Thomas Lukasiewicz |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2022 | Deep Learning with Logical ConstraintsabstractIn recent years, there has been an increasing interest in exploiting logically specified background knowledge in order to obtain neural models (i) with a better performance, (ii) able to learn from less data, and/or (iii) guaranteed to be compliant with the background knowledge itself, e.g., for safety-critical applications. In this survey, we retrace such works and categorize them based on (i) the logical language that they use to express the background knowledge and (ii) the goals that they achieve. Eleonora Giunchiglia, Mihaela Catalina Stoian, Thomas Lukasiewicz |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Analyzing ASR Pretraining for Low-Resource Speech-to-Text TranslationabstractPrevious work has shown that for low-resource source languages, automatic speech-to-text translation (AST) can be improved by pre-training an end-to-end model on automatic speech recognition (ASR) data from a high-resource language. However, it is not clear what factors - e.g., language relatedness or size of the pretraining data - yield the biggest improvements, or whether pretraining can be effectively combined with other methods such as data augmentation. Here, we experiment with pretraining on datasets of varying sizes, including languages related and unrelated to the AST source language. We find that the best predictor of final AST performance is the word error rate of the pretrained ASR model, and that differences in ASR/AST performance correlate with how phonetic information is encoded in the later RNN layers of our model. We also show that pretraining and data augmentation yield complementary benefits for AST. Mihaela Catalina Stoian, Sameer Bansal, Sharon Goldwater |
ICASSP | 1 |