Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianhao Wang 0017

dblp:296/3981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 73% Learning theory · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 8%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
1.932024
The Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGD · ICLR 2024
Fast Mixing of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2022
What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
1.322024
The Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGD · ICLR 2024
Fast Mixing of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization
0.912025
Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.912025
Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.612022
What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › implicit bias
implicit bias of gradient descent
0.612022
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descent · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization
0.612022
What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.612022
What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
mirror descent
0.612022
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descent · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
online learning regret
0.312025
Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shampoo · 1.7kronecker-factored preconditioner · 1.7adagrad · 1.7variance reduction analysis · 0.8momentum · 0.8stochastic differential equation · 0.6scale-invariant loss · 0.6nash's embedding theorem · 0.6mirror descent · 0.6mathematical framework · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 How Well Can Transformers Emulate In-Context Newton's Method?
abstract
Transformer-based models have demonstrated remarkable in-context learning capabilities, prompting extensive research into its underlying mechanisms. Recent studies have suggested that Transformers can implement first-order optimization algorithms for in-context learning and even second order ones for the case of linear regression. In this work, we study whether Transformers can perform higher order optimization methods, beyond the case of linear regression. We establish that linear attention Transformers with ReLU layers can approximate second order optimization algorithms for the task of logistic regression and achieve $\epsilon$ error with only a logarithmic to the error more layers. Our results suggest the ability of the Transformer architecture to implement complex algorithms, beyond gradient descent.
Angeliki Giannou, Liu Yang 0001, Tianhao Wang 0017, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos, Jason D. Lee
AISTATS3
2025 Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis
abstract
We present a novel unified analysis for a broad class of adaptive optimization algorithms with structured (e.g., layerwise, diagonal, and kronecker-factored) preconditioners for both online regret minimization and offline convex optimization. Our analysis not only provides matching rate to several important structured preconditioned algorithms including diagonal AdaGrad, full-matrix AdaGrad, and AdaGrad-Norm, but also gives an improved convergence rate for a one-sided variant of Shampoo over that of original Shampoo. Interestingly, more structured preconditioners (e.g., diagonal Adagrad, AdaGrad-Norm which use less space and compute) are often presented as computationally efficient approximations to full-matrix Adagrad, aiming for improved optimization performance through better approximations. Our unified analysis challenges this prevailing view and reveals, perhaps surprisingly, that more structured preconditioners, despite using less space and computation per step, can outperform their less structured counterparts. To demonstrate this, we show that one-sided Shampoo, which is relatively much cheaper than full-matrix AdaGrad could outperform it both theoretically and experimentally.
Shuo Xie, Tianhao Wang 0017, Sashank J. Reddi, Sanjiv Kumar, Zhiyuan Li 0005
ICML2
2024 The Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGD
abstract
Momentum is known to accelerate the convergence of gradient descent in strongly convex settings without stochastic gradient noise. In stochastic optimization, such as training neural networks, folklore suggests that momentum may help deep learning optimization by reducing the variance of the stochastic gradient update, but previous theoretical analyses do not find momentum to offer any provable acceleration. Theoretical results in this paper clarify the role of momentum in stochastic settings where the learning rate is small and gradient noise is the dominant source of instability, suggesting that SGD with and without momentum behave similarly in the short and long time horizons. Experiments show that momentum indeed has limited benefits for both optimization and generalization in practical training regimes where the optimal learning rate is not very large, including small- to medium-batch training from scratch on ImageNet and fine-tuning language models on downstream tasks.
Runzhe Wang, Sadhika Malladi, Tianhao Wang 0017, Kaifeng Lyu, Zhiyuan Li 0005
ICLR3
2022 What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework
Zhiyuan Li 0005, Tianhao Wang 0017, Sanjeev Arora
ICLR2
2022 Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descent
abstract
As part of the effort to understand implicit bias of gradient descent in overparametrized models, several results have shown how the training trajectory on the overparametrized model can be understood as mirror descent on a different objective. The main result here is a complete characterization of this phenomenon under a notion termed commuting parametrization, which encompasses all the previous results in this setting. It is shown that gradient flow with any commuting parametrization is equivalent to continuous mirror descent with a related mirror map. Conversely, continuous mirror descent with any mirror map can be viewed as gradient flow with a related commuting parametrization. The latter result relies upon Nash's embedding theorem.
Zhiyuan Li 0005, Tianhao Wang 0017, Jason D. Lee, Sanjeev Arora
NeurIPS2
2022 Fast Mixing of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Normalization and Weight Decay
abstract
We prove the Fast Equilibrium Conjecture proposed by Li et al., (2020), i.e., stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on a scale-invariant loss (e.g., using networks with various normalization schemes) with learning rate $\eta$ and weight decay factor $\lambda$ mixes in function space in $\mathcal{\tilde{O}}(\frac{1}{\lambda\eta})$ steps, under two standard assumptions: (1) the noise covariance matrix is non-degenerate and (2) the minimizers of the loss form a connected, compact and analytic manifold. The analysis uses the framework of Li et al., (2021) and shows that for every $T>0$, the iterates of SGD with learning rate $\eta$ and weight decay factor $\lambda$ on the scale-invariant loss converge in distribution in $\Theta\left(\eta^{-1}\lambda^{-1}(T+\ln(\lambda/\eta))\right)$ iterations as $\eta\lambda\to 0$ while satisfying $\eta \le O(\lambda)\le O(1)$. Moreover, the evolution of the limiting distribution can be described by a stochastic differential equation that mixes to the same equilibrium distribution for every initialization around the manifold of minimizers as $T\to\infty$.
Zhiyuan Li 0005, Tianhao Wang 0017, Dingli Yu
NeurIPS2