Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianhao Wang 0017
dblp:296/3981
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 73% Learning theory · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | The Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGD · ICLR 2024 Fast Mixing of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2022 What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | The Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGD · ICLR 2024 Fast Mixing of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › implicit bias
implicit bias of gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
mirror descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descent · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
online learning regret |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
shampoo · 1.7kronecker-factored preconditioner · 1.7adagrad · 1.7variance reduction analysis · 0.8momentum · 0.8stochastic differential equation · 0.6scale-invariant loss · 0.6nash's embedding theorem · 0.6mirror descent · 0.6mathematical framework · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How Well Can Transformers Emulate In-Context Newton's Method?abstractTransformer-based models have demonstrated remarkable in-context learning capabilities, prompting extensive research into its underlying mechanisms. Recent studies have suggested that Transformers can implement first-order optimization algorithms for in-context learning and even second order ones for the case of linear regression. In this work, we study whether Transformers can perform higher order optimization methods, beyond the case of linear regression. We establish that linear attention Transformers with ReLU layers can approximate second order optimization algorithms for the task of logistic regression and achieve $\epsilon$ error with only a logarithmic to the error more layers. Our results suggest the ability of the Transformer architecture to implement complex algorithms, beyond gradient descent. Angeliki Giannou, Liu Yang 0001, Tianhao Wang 0017, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos, Jason D. Lee |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2025 | Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified AnalysisabstractWe present a novel unified analysis for a broad class of adaptive optimization algorithms with structured (e.g., layerwise, diagonal, and kronecker-factored) preconditioners for both online regret minimization and offline convex optimization. Our analysis not only provides matching rate to several important structured preconditioned algorithms including diagonal AdaGrad, full-matrix AdaGrad, and AdaGrad-Norm, but also gives an improved convergence rate for a one-sided variant of Shampoo over that of original Shampoo. Interestingly, more structured preconditioners (e.g., diagonal Adagrad, AdaGrad-Norm which use less space and compute) are often presented as computationally efficient approximations to full-matrix Adagrad, aiming for improved optimization performance through better approximations. Our unified analysis challenges this prevailing view and reveals, perhaps surprisingly, that more structured preconditioners, despite using less space and computation per step, can outperform their less structured counterparts. To demonstrate this, we show that one-sided Shampoo, which is relatively much cheaper than full-matrix AdaGrad could outperform it both theoretically and experimentally. Shuo Xie, Tianhao Wang 0017, Sashank J. Reddi, Sanjiv Kumar, Zhiyuan Li 0005 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | The Marginal Value of Momentum for Small Learning Rate SGDabstractMomentum is known to accelerate the convergence of gradient descent in strongly convex settings without stochastic gradient noise. In stochastic optimization, such as training neural networks, folklore suggests that momentum may help deep learning optimization by reducing the variance of the stochastic gradient update, but previous theoretical analyses do not find momentum to offer any provable acceleration. Theoretical results in this paper clarify the role of momentum in stochastic settings where the learning rate is small and gradient noise is the dominant source of instability, suggesting that SGD with and without momentum behave similarly in the short and long time horizons. Experiments show that momentum indeed has limited benefits for both optimization and generalization in practical training regimes where the optimal learning rate is not very large, including small- to medium-batch training from scratch on ImageNet and fine-tuning language models on downstream tasks. Runzhe Wang, Sadhika Malladi, Tianhao Wang 0017, Kaifeng Lyu, Zhiyuan Li 0005 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Framework
Zhiyuan Li 0005, Tianhao Wang 0017, Sanjeev Arora |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror DescentabstractAs part of the effort to understand implicit bias of gradient descent in overparametrized models, several results have shown how the training trajectory on the overparametrized model can be understood as mirror descent on a different objective. The main result here is a complete characterization of this phenomenon under a notion termed commuting parametrization, which encompasses all the previous results in this setting. It is shown that gradient flow with any commuting parametrization is equivalent to continuous mirror descent with a related mirror map. Conversely, continuous mirror descent with any mirror map can be viewed as gradient flow with a related commuting parametrization. The latter result relies upon Nash's embedding theorem. Zhiyuan Li 0005, Tianhao Wang 0017, Jason D. Lee, Sanjeev Arora |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Fast Mixing of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Normalization and Weight DecayabstractWe prove the Fast Equilibrium Conjecture proposed by Li et al., (2020), i.e., stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on a scale-invariant loss (e.g., using networks with various normalization schemes) with learning rate $\eta$ and weight decay factor $\lambda$ mixes in function space in $\mathcal{\tilde{O}}(\frac{1}{\lambda\eta})$ steps, under two standard assumptions: (1) the noise covariance matrix is non-degenerate and (2) the minimizers of the loss form a connected, compact and analytic manifold. The analysis uses the framework of Li et al., (2021) and shows that for every $T>0$, the iterates of SGD with learning rate $\eta$ and weight decay factor $\lambda$ on the scale-invariant loss converge in distribution in $\Theta\left(\eta^{-1}\lambda^{-1}(T+\ln(\lambda/\eta))\right)$ iterations as $\eta\lambda\to 0$ while satisfying $\eta \le O(\lambda)\le O(1)$. Moreover, the evolution of the limiting distribution can be described by a stochastic differential equation that mixes to the same equilibrium distribution for every initialization around the manifold of minimizers as $T\to\infty$. Zhiyuan Li 0005, Tianhao Wang 0017, Dingli Yu |
NeurIPS | 2 |