EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mark W. Nemecek
dblp:296/8537
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › transfer learning in reinforcement learning
policy reuse |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Policy Caches with Successor Features · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
successor features |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Policy Caches with Successor Features · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value function estimation
action value function |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Policy Caches with Successor Features · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › transfer learning in reinforcement learning
value function transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Policy Caches with Successor Features · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
successor features · 0.5policy caching · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Policy Caches with Successor FeaturesabstractTransfer in reinforcement learning is based on the idea that it is possible to use what is learned in one task to improve the learning process in another task. For transfer between tasks which share transition dynamics but differ in reward function, successor features have been shown to be a useful representation which allows for efficient computation of action-value functions for previously-learned policies in new tasks. These functions induce policies in the new tasks, so an agent may not need to learn a new policy for each new task it encounters, especially if it is allowed some amount of suboptimality in those tasks. We present new bounds for the performance of optimal policies in a new task, as well as an approach to use these bounds to decide, when presented with a new task, whether to use cached policies or learn a new policy. Mark W. Nemecek, Ron Parr |
ICML | 1 |