Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Patricia Friedmann

dblp:296/8607 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education
intelligent tutoring systems
0.011988
A graphical programming language interface for an intelligent LISP tutor · CHI 1988
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
visual programming languages
0.011988
A graphical programming language interface for an intelligent LISP tutor · CHI 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ideal model problem solving · 0.0graphical interface design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 A graphical programming language interface for an intelligent LISP tutor
abstract
We describe an intelligent tutor for programming embedded in a graphical programming language. The tutor monitors students' problem solving and provides feedback and guidance. Explanations are generated from the content of the ideal model's problem solving rules. The graphical interface is designed to facilitate the acquisition of causal models of programming. Students work in a medium that corresponds to their planning operations. The interface enables forward and backward chaining, thus conveying the structure of the planning more effectively than a text-based interface. The interface also provides a graphical record of the solution history and current goals.
Brian J. Reiser, Patricia Friedmann, Jody Gevins Underwood, Daniel Y. Kimberg, Michael Andrew Ranney
CHI2