EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sarah Ashok Sonje
dblp:296/9034
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Indexing and storage engines · 50% Database system architecture and tuning · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indexing and storage engines › storage management
data layout optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic Data Layout Optimization with Worst-Case Guarantees · ICDE 2024 |
Database system architecture and tuning › database administration
online reorganization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic Data Layout Optimization with Worst-Case Guarantees · ICDE 2024 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
metrical task systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic Data Layout Optimization with Worst-Case Guarantees · ICDE 2024 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dynamic Data Layout Optimization with Worst-Case Guarantees · ICDE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metrical task systems · 1.5competitive analysis · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Dynamic Data Layout Optimization with Worst-Case GuaranteesabstractMany data analytics systems store and process large datasets in partitions containing millions of rows. By mapping rows to partitions in an optimized way, it is possible to improve query performance by skipping over large numbers of irrelevant partitions during query processing. This mapping is referred to as a data layout. Recent works have shown that customizing the data layout to the anticipated query workload greatly improves query performance, but the performance benefits may disappear if the workload changes. Reorganizing data layouts to accommodate workload drift can resolve this issue, but reorganization costs could exceed query savings if not done carefully. In this paper, we present an algorithmic framework OReO that makes online reorganization decisions to balance the benefits of improved query performance with the costs of reorganization. Our framework extends results from Metrical Task Systems to provide a tight bound on the worst-case performance guarantee for online reorganization, without prior knowledge of the query workload. Through evaluation on real-world datasets and query workloads, our experiments demonstrate that online reorganization with OReO can lead to an up to 32% improvement in combined query and reorganization time compared to using a single, optimized data layout for the entire workload. Kexin Rong 0001, Paul Liu 0001, Sarah Ashok Sonje, Moses Charikar |
ICDE | 3 |