Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Scholtes
dblp:297/4076
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 40% Reinforcement learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
BERT-style pretraining |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
representation learning for reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented question answering · 1.1parametric fine-tuning · 1.1contrastive learning · 0.6BERT · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning
Andrea Banino, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Jacob C. Walker, Tim Scholtes, Jovana Mitrovic, Charles Blundell |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering ModelsabstractKnowledge and language understanding of models evaluated through question answering (QA) has been usually studied on static snapshots of knowledge, like Wikipedia. However, our world is dynamic, evolves over time, and our models’ knowledge becomes outdated. To study how semi-parametric QA models and their underlying parametric language models (LMs) adapt to evolving knowledge, we construct a new large-scale dataset, StreamingQA, with human written and generated questions asked on a given date, to be answered from 14 years of time-stamped news articles. We evaluate our models quarterly as they read new articles not seen in pre-training. We show that parametric models can be updated without full retraining, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. For semi-parametric models, adding new articles into the search space allows for rapid adaptation, however, models with an outdated underlying LM under-perform those with a retrained LM. For questions about higher-frequency named entities, parametric updates are particularly beneficial. In our dynamic world, the StreamingQA dataset enables a more realistic evaluation of QA models, and our experiments highlight several promising directions for future research. Adam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi, Eren Sezener, Devang Agrawal, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tim Scholtes, Manzil Zaheer, Susannah Young, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon, Sophia Austin, Phil Blunsom, Angeliki Lazaridou |
ICML | 8 |