Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Scholtes

dblp:297/4076 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 40% Reinforcement learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
BERT-style pretraining
0.612022
CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.612022
CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
representation learning for reinforcement learning
0.612022
CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented question answering · 1.1parametric fine-tuning · 1.1contrastive learning · 0.6BERT · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 CoBERL: Contrastive BERT for Reinforcement Learning
Andrea Banino, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Jacob C. Walker, Tim Scholtes, Jovana Mitrovic, Charles Blundell
ICLR4
2022 StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering Models
abstract
Knowledge and language understanding of models evaluated through question answering (QA) has been usually studied on static snapshots of knowledge, like Wikipedia. However, our world is dynamic, evolves over time, and our models’ knowledge becomes outdated. To study how semi-parametric QA models and their underlying parametric language models (LMs) adapt to evolving knowledge, we construct a new large-scale dataset, StreamingQA, with human written and generated questions asked on a given date, to be answered from 14 years of time-stamped news articles. We evaluate our models quarterly as they read new articles not seen in pre-training. We show that parametric models can be updated without full retraining, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. For semi-parametric models, adding new articles into the search space allows for rapid adaptation, however, models with an outdated underlying LM under-perform those with a retrained LM. For questions about higher-frequency named entities, parametric updates are particularly beneficial. In our dynamic world, the StreamingQA dataset enables a more realistic evaluation of QA models, and our experiments highlight several promising directions for future research.
Adam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi, Eren Sezener, Devang Agrawal, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tim Scholtes, Manzil Zaheer, Susannah Young, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon, Sophia Austin, Phil Blunsom, Angeliki Lazaridou
ICML8