EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Augustinos D. Saravanos
dblp:297/4304
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4063-9963ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 27% Generative modeling · 22% Optimization for machine learning · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic Programming · ICLR 2025 Distributed Differential Dynamic Programming Architectures for Large-Scale Multiagent Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Momentum Multi-Marginal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic Programming · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion bridge
schrödinger bridge matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Momentum Multi-Marginal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
stochastic optimal control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Momentum Multi-Marginal Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
quadratic programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic Programming · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A robust differential Neural ODE Optimizer · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A robust differential Neural ODE Optimizer · ICLR 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
differential dynamic programming |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Distributed Differential Dynamic Programming Architectures for Large-Scale Multiagent Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Distributed Differential Dynamic Programming Architectures for Large-Scale Multiagent Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Distributed Differential Dynamic Programming Architectures for Large-Scale Multiagent Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
alternating direction method of multipliers |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Distributed Differential Dynamic Programming Architectures for Large-Scale Multiagent Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential dynamic programming · 2.1operator splitting · 1.7deep learning · 1.7consensus optimization · 1.7PAC-Bayes theory · 1.7variational objective · 0.9transport map · 0.9phase-space lifting · 0.9min-max optimization · 0.8game theory · 0.8augmented lagrangian · 0.7ADMM · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Deep Distributed Optimization for Large-Scale Quadratic ProgrammingabstractQuadratic programming (QP) forms a crucial foundation in optimization, appearing in a broad spectrum of domains and serving as the basis for more advanced algorithms. Consequently, as the scale and complexity of modern applications continue to grow, the development of efficient and reliable QP algorithms becomes increasingly vital. In this context, this paper introduces a novel deep learning-aided distributed optimization architecture designed for tackling large-scale QP problems. First, we combine the state-of-the-art Operator Splitting QP (OSQP) method with a consensus approach to derive **DistributedQP**, a new method tailored for network-structured problems, with convergence guarantees to optimality. Subsequently, we unfold this optimizer into a deep learning framework, leading to **DeepDistributedQP**, which leverages learned policies to accelerate reaching to desired accuracy within a restricted amount of iterations. Our approach is also theoretically grounded through Probably Approximately Correct (PAC)-Bayes theory, providing generalization bounds on the expected optimality gap for unseen problems. The proposed framework, as well as its centralized version **DeepQP**, significantly outperform their standard optimization counterparts on a variety of tasks such as randomly generated problems, optimal control, linear regression, transportation networks and others. Notably, DeepDistributedQP demonstrates strong generalization by training on small problems and scaling to solve much larger ones (up to 50K variables and 150K constraints) using the same policy. Moreover, it achieves orders-of-magnitude improvements in wall-clock time compared to OSQP. The certifiable performance guarantees of our approach are also demonstrated, ensuring higher-quality solutions over traditional optimizers. Augustinos D. Saravanos, Hunter Kuperman, Alex Oshin, Arshiya Taj Abdul, Vincent Pacelli, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Momentum Multi-Marginal Schrödinger Bridge MatchingabstractUnderstanding complex systems by inferring trajectories from sparse sample snapshots is a fundamental challenge in a wide range of domains, e.g., single-cell biology, meteorology, and economics. Despite advancements in Bridge and Flow matching frameworks, current methodologies rely on pairwise interpolation between adjacent snapshots. This hinders their ability to capture long-range temporal dependencies and potentially affects the coherence of the inferred trajectories. To address these issues, we introduce Momentum Multi-Marginal Schrödinger Bridge Matching (3MSBM), a novel matching framework that learns smooth measure-valued splines for stochastic systems that satisfy multiple positional constraints. This is achieved by lifting the dynamics to phase space and generalizing stochastic bridges to be conditioned on several points, forming a multi-marginal conditional stochastic optimal control problem. The underlying dynamics are then learned by minimizing a variational objective, having fixed the path induced by the multi-marginal conditional bridge. As a matching approach, 3MSBM learns transport maps that preserve intermediate marginals throughout training, significantly improving convergence and scalability. Extensive experimentation in a series of real-world applications validates the superior performance of 3MSBM compared to existing methods in capturing complex dynamics with temporal dependencies, opening new avenues for training matching frameworks in multi-marginal settings. Panagiotis Theodoropoulos, Augustinos D. Saravanos, Evangelos A. Theodorou, Guan-Horng Liu |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | A robust differential Neural ODE OptimizerabstractNeural networks and neural ODEs tend to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, rendering robust optimizers critical to curb the success of such attacks. In this regard, the key insight of this work is to interpret Neural ODE optimization as a min-max optimal control problem. More particularly, we present Game Theoretic Second-Order Neural Optimizer (GTSONO), a robust game theoretic optimizer based on the principles of min-max Differential Dynamic Programming.
The proposed method exhibits significant computational benefits due to efficient matrix decompositions and provides convergence guarantees to local saddle points.
Empirically, the robustness of the proposed optimizer is demonstrated through greater robust accuracy compared to benchmark optimizers when trained on clean images. Additionally, its ability to provide a performance increase when adapted to an already existing adversarial defense technique is also illustrated.
Finally, the superiority of the proposed update law over its gradient based counterpart highlights the potential benefits of incorporating robust optimal control paradigms into adversarial training methods. Panagiotis Theodoropoulos, Guan-Horng Liu, Tianrong Chen, Augustinos D. Saravanos, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | Distributed Model Predictive Covariance SteeringabstractThis paper proposes Distributed Model Predictive Covariance Steering (DiMPCS) for multi-agent control under stochastic uncertainty. The scope of our approach is to blend covariance steering theory, distributed optimization and model predictive control (MPC) into a single framework that is safe, scalable and decentralized. Initially, we pose a problem formulation that uses the Wasserstein distance to steer the state distributions of a multi-agent system to desired targets, and probabilistic constraints to ensure safety. We then transform this problem into a finite-dimensional optimization one by utilizing a disturbance feedback policy parametrization for covariance steering and a tractable approximation of the safety constraints. To solve the latter problem, we derive a decentralized consensus-based algorithm using the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers. This method is then extended to a receding horizon form, which yields the proposed DiMPCS algorithm. Simulation experiments on a variety of multi-robot tasks with up to hundreds of robots demonstrate the effectiveness of DiMPCS. The superior scalability and performance of the proposed method is also highlighted through a comparison against related stochastic MPC approaches. Finally, hardware results on a multi-robot platform also verify the applicability of DiMPCS on real systems. Augustinos D. Saravanos, Isin M. Balci, Efstathios Bakolas, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
IROS | 1 |
| 2023 | Distributed Differential Dynamic Programming Architectures for Large-Scale Multiagent ControlabstractThis article proposes two decentralized multiagent optimal control methods that combine the computational efficiency and scalability of differential dynamic programming (DDP) and the distributed nature of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). The first one, nested distributed DDP, is a three-level architecture, which employs ADMM for consensus, an augmented Lagrangian layer for local constraints and DDP as the local optimizer. The second one, merged distributed DDP, is a two-level architecture that addresses both consensus and local constraints with ADMM, further reducing computational complexity. Both frameworks arefully decentralizedsince all computations are parallelizable among the agents and only local communication is necessary. Simulation results that scale up to thousands of cars and hundreds of drones demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithms. Superior scalability to large-scale systems against other DDP and sequential quadratic programming methods is also illustrated. Finally, hardware experiments on a multirobot platform verify the applicability of the methods. A video with all results is provided in the supplementary material. Augustinos D. Saravanos, Yuichiro Aoyama, Hongchang Zhu, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |