Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Donald Dunagan
dblp:297/4563
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 75% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
cognitive modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multipath parsing in the brain · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multipath parsing in the brain · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
incremental dependency parsing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multipath parsing in the brain · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multipath parsing in the brain · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
syntactic surprisal · 0.8fMRI correlation · 0.8LLM-adapted encodings · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Multipath parsing in the brainabstractHumans understand sentences word-by-word, in the order that they hear them.This incrementality entails resolving temporary ambiguities about syntactic relationships.We investigate how humans process these syntactic ambiguities by correlating predictions from incremental generative dependency parsers with timecourse data from people undergoing functional neuroimaging while listening to an audiobook.In particular, we compare competing hypotheses regarding the number of developing syntactic analyses in play during word-by-word comprehension: one vs more than one.This comparison involves evaluating syntactic surprisal from a state-of-the-art dependency parser with LLM-adapted encodings against an existing fMRI dataset.In both English and Chinese data, we find evidence for multipath parsing.Brain regions associated with this multipath effect include bilateral superior temporal gyrus. Berta Franzluebbers, Donald Dunagan, Milos Stanojevic, Jan Buys, John T. Hale |
ACL (1) | 2 |