Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tobias Kirsch
dblp:297/5132
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-2430-6871ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Routing and switching · 70% Network management and operations · 30% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network management and operations
configuration verification |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | Demo: Stopping Production Testing: A Graphical RPKI Test-Suite · CCS 2025 The Fault in Our Drafts: Vulnerabilities in RPKI Specification and Software · SP 2026 |
Routing and switching
inter-domain routing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Fault in Our Drafts: Vulnerabilities in RPKI Specification and Software · SP 2026 |
Network security
routing security |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Fault in Our Drafts: Vulnerabilities in RPKI Specification and Software · SP 2026 |
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › BGP
BGP security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Demo: Stopping Production Testing: A Graphical RPKI Test-Suite · CCS 2025 |
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › inter-domain routing security
RPKI |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Demo: Stopping Production Testing: A Graphical RPKI Test-Suite · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
specification analysis · 2.0software vulnerability analysis · 2.0validator testing · 0.9DER/base64 object parsing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The Fault in Our Drafts: Vulnerabilities in RPKI Specification and Softwareabstract2815 Oliver Jacobsen, Tobias Kirsch, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel, Michael Waidner |
SP | 2 |
| 2025 | Demo: Stopping Production Testing: A Graphical RPKI Test-SuiteabstractThe Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) is increasingly protecting global BGP routing and major players are pushing for wide-scale adoption. RPKI protection relies on correct publication and validity of RPKI objects: If a prefix has no valid covering RPKI object, e.g., because the object is invalid or expired, the prefix is not protected from hijacks. At the same time, ASes that issue RPKI objects lack any feedback whether their objects are considered valid by all RPKI validation software. This lack of feedback has repeatedly led to operational issues, and problems with object validity are persistent to this day. Oftentimes, issues with objects are only detected in production, after they have caused damage to routing. A prominent example of this is an issue with Amazon objects in 2023 that left 6000 of its prefixes open to hijack in any AS using a specific RPKI validator software implementation. In this work, we present a novel RPKI toolsuite that allows for comprehensive testing of RPKI objects, enabling operators to detect issues in their object configurations before production use. For this, our tool allows parsing arbitrary DER/base64 encoded objects, editing their content and structure, and live-testing them against all current RPKI validator implementations to probe for inconsistent validation results, errors, and even vulnerabilities. Our work provides an important foundation to ensure RPKI resilience against misconfigurations and facilitates future research into RPKI security. We make our tool open-source and provide a hosted web application to enable usage by the community. Tobias Kirsch, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel |
CCS | 1 |