Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marie-Charlotte Brandenburg
dblp:297/5374
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5721-2325ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 75% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How to Learn a Star: Binary Classification with Starshaped Polyhedral Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decomposition Polyhedra of Piecewise Linear Functions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › nonlinear classification
piecewise linear classifier |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How to Learn a Star: Binary Classification with Starshaped Polyhedral Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › VC theory
VC dimension |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How to Learn a Star: Binary Classification with Starshaped Polyhedral Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | How to Learn a Star: Binary Classification with Starshaped Polyhedral Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polyhedral complex · 1.7hyperplane arrangement · 1.7exponential probability distribution · 1.7submodular functions · 0.9submodular function · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Decomposition Polyhedra of Piecewise Linear FunctionsabstractIn this paper we contribute to the frequently studied question of how to decompose a continuous piecewise linear (CPWL) function into a difference of two convex CPWL functions. Every CPWL function has infinitely many such decompositions, but for applications in optimization and neural network theory, it is crucial to find decompositions with as few linear pieces as possible. This is a highly challenging problem, as we further demonstrate by disproving a recently proposed approach by Tran and Wang [Minimal representations of tropical rational functions. Algebraic Statistics, 15(1):27–59, 2024]. To make the problem more tractable, we propose to fix an underlying polyhedral complex determining the possible locus of nonlinearity. Under this assumption, we prove that the set of decompositions forms a polyhedron that arises as intersection of two translated cones. We prove that irreducible decompositions correspond to the bounded faces of this polyhedron and minimal solutions must be vertices. We then identify cases with a unique minimal decomposition, and illustrate how our insights have consequences in the theory of submodular functions. Finally, we improve upon previous constructions of neural networks for a given convex CPWL function and apply our framework to obtain results in the nonconvex case. Marie-Charlotte Brandenburg, Moritz Grillo, Christoph Hertrich |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | How to Learn a Star: Binary Classification with Starshaped Polyhedral SetsabstractWe consider binary classification restricted to a class of continuous piecewise linear functions whose decision boundaries are (possibly nonconvex) starshaped polyhedral sets, supported on a fixed polyhedral simplicial fan. We investigate the expressivity of these function classes and describe the combinatorial and geometric structure of the loss landscape, most prominently the sublevel sets, for two loss-functions: the 0/1-loss (discrete loss) and a log-likelihood loss function. In particular, we give explicit bounds on the VC dimension of this model, and concretely describe the sublevel sets of the discrete loss as chambers in a hyperplane arrangement. For the log-likelihood loss, we give sufficient conditions for the optimum to be unique, and describe the geometry of the optimum when varying the rate parameter of the underlying exponential probability distribution. Marie-Charlotte Brandenburg, Katharina Jochemko |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Multivariate volume, Ehrhart, and h⁎-polynomials of polytropes
Marie-Charlotte Brandenburg, Sophia Elia, Leon Zhang |
J. Symb. Comput. | 1 |