Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matús Mesarcík
dblp:297/9188
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3311-5333ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 74% Privacy and data protection · 26% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
algorithmic auditing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Beyond the Checkbox: Strengthening DSA Compliance Through Social Media Algorithmic Auditing · CHI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generation · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user simulation · 3.0behavioral assessment · 3.0red-teaming · 0.9red teaming · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Beyond the Checkbox: Strengthening DSA Compliance Through Social Media Algorithmic AuditingabstractAlgorithms of online platforms are required under the Digital Services Act (DSA) to comply with specific obligations concerning algorithmic transparency, user protection and privacy. To verify compliance with these requirements, DSA mandates platforms to undergo independent audits. Little is known about current auditing practices and their effectiveness in ensuring such compliance. To this end, we bridge regulatory and technical perspectives by critically examining selected audit reports across three critical algorithmic-related provisions: restrictions on profiling minors, transparency in recommender systems, and limitations on targeted advertising using sensitive data. Our analysis shows significant inconsistencies in methodologies and lack of technical depth when evaluating AI-powered systems. To enhance the depth, scale, and independence of compliance assessments, we propose to employ algorithmic auditing – a process of behavioural assessment of AI algorithms by means of simulating user behaviour, observing algorithm responses and analysing them for audited phenomena. Sara Solarova, Matús Mesarcík, Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba |
CHI | 2 |
| 2025 | Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation GenerationabstractAneta Zugecova, Dominik Macko, Ivan Srba, Robert Moro, Jakub Kopál, Katarína Marcinčinová, Matúš Mesarčík. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Aneta Zugecova, Dominik Macko, Ivan Srba, Róbert Móro, Jakub Kopal, Katarina Marcincinova, Matús Mesarcík |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2025 | Evolving cybersecurity of AI-featured digital products and services: Rise of standardisation and certification?
Michal Rampásek, Matús Mesarcík, Jozef Andrasko |
Comput. Law Secur. Rev. | 2 |
| 2023 | On defense of "ethification" of law: How ethics may improve compliance with the EU digital laws
Matús Mesarcík, Juraj Podrouzek, Adrian Gavornik |
Comput. Law Secur. Rev. | 1 |