The AI community has witnessed the emergence of various chat-style Large Language Models (LLMs) since the advent of ChatGPT. Despite significant progress in this area, evaluating these models remains a substantial challenge. The evaluations provided by humans or GPT-4 oracles are often taken as the gold standard, but they are neither automatic nor scalable. More recently, a series of (open source) LLM-based judge models have been introduced, yet they often exhibit model-specific biases, e.g., a LLaMA-family judge favors a LLaMA-family model. On the other hand, autoregressive evaluation metrics, which holds the potential to address the aforementioned issues, remains underexplored. Among them, likelihood-based metrics such as perplexity and Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) are widely adopted and has proven effective in tracking the pre-training progress of LLMs. However, they struggle to evaluate the generation capabilities of fine-tuned models due to exposure bias , a phenomenon where the distribution of the model’s output gradually deviates from the ground-truth during inference. To address this key issue, in this article, we propose a novel autoregressive metric, Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG), to improve the evaluation of fine-tuned LLMs. Our experimental results demonstrate that NDCG significantly outperforms likelihood-based metrics: it shows over 45% improvement in both Spearman and Kendall’s tau correlation coefficients for commonsense QA tasks, and aligns more closely with GPT-4 Elo rankings for instruction-tuned models.

Misleading visualizations, which manipulate chart representations to support specific claims, can distort perception and lead to incorrect conclusions.Despite decades of research, they remain a widespread issue, posing risks to public understanding and raising safety concerns for AI systems involved in data-driven communication.While recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show strong chart comprehension abilities, their capacity to detect and interpret misleading charts remains unexplored.We introduce Misleading ChartQA benchmark, a large-scale multimodal dataset designed to evaluate MLLMs on misleading chart reasoning.It contains 3,026 curated examples spanning 21 misleader types and 10 chart types, each with standardized chart code, CSV data, multiple-choice questions, and labeled explanations, validated through iterative MLLM checks and expert human review.We benchmark 24 state-of-the-art MLLMs, analyze their performance across misleader types and chart formats, and propose a novel regionaware reasoning pipeline that enhances model accuracy.Our work lays the foundation for developing MLLMs that are robust, trustworthy, and aligned with the demands of responsible visual communication.

Language model pretraining involves training on extensive corpora, where data quality plays a pivotal role. In this work, we aim to directly estimate the contribution of data during pretraining and select pretraining data in an efficient manner. Specifically, we draw inspiration from recent findings showing that compression efficiency (i.e., normalized loss) of diverse models on certain text correlates strongly with their downstream performance, when the text domain aligns with the downstream benchmarks (Huang et al., 2024). Building on this observation, we hypothesize that data on which model losses are predictive of downstream abilities also contribute effectively to learning, which shares similar intuition with Thrush et al. (2024). To leverage this insight, we introduce predictive data selection (PreSelect), a lightweight and efficient data selection method that requires training and deploying only a fastText-based scorer. Through comprehensive experiments with 1B and 3B parameter models, we demonstrate that models trained on 30B tokens selected with PreSelect surpass the performance of the vanilla baseline trained on 300B tokens, achieving a 10x reduction in compute requirements. Furthermore, PreSelect significantly outperforms other competitive data selection baselines, such as DCLM and FineWeb-Edu on a scale of 3B models trained on 100B tokens. We open-source our trained data selection scorer along with the curated datasets at https://github.com/hkust-nlp/PreSelect.

Cheng Niu, Yuanhao Wu, Juno Zhu, Siliang Xu, KaShun Shum, Randy Zhong, Juntong Song, Tong Zhang. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.

KaShun Shum, Minrui Xu, Jianshu Zhang, Zixin Chen, Shizhe Diao, Hanze Dong, Jipeng Zhang, Muhammad Omer Raza. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.