EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Mangold
dblp:298/1535
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-author · 9 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 19% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
2.2 | 3 | 2025 | Scaffold with Stochastic Gradients: New Analysis with Linear Speed-Up · ICML 2025 SCAFFLSA: Taming Heterogeneity in Federated Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learning · NeurIPS 2024 FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in Classification · ICML 2023 Differentially Private Coordinate Descent for Composite Empirical Risk Minimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
client drift |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaffold with Stochastic Gradients: New Analysis with Linear Speed-Up · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaffold with Stochastic Gradients: New Analysis with Linear Speed-Up · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaffold with Stochastic Gradients: New Analysis with Linear Speed-Up · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaffold with Stochastic Gradients: New Analysis with Linear Speed-Up · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SCAFFLSA: Taming Heterogeneity in Federated Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic approximation
linear stochastic approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SCAFFLSA: Taming Heterogeneity in Federated Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SCAFFLSA: Taming Heterogeneity in Federated Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in Classification · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › group fairness
group fairness metrics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in Classification · ICML 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
privacy-fairness trade-off |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in Classification · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated learning systems
cross-silo federated learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Coordinate Descent for Composite Empirical Risk Minimization · ICML 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Coordinate Descent for Composite Empirical Risk Minimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical informatics › clinical AI
clinical machine learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settings · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
control variates · 2.4client drift correction · 1.5non-asymptotic bounds · 1.3lipschitz continuity analysis · 1.3proximal coordinate descent · 1.1gradient clipping · 1.1federated averaging · 1.1benchmark suite · 1.1wasserstein distance · 0.9markov chain analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Federated UCBVI: Communication-Efficient Federated Regret Minimization with Heterogeneous AgentsabstractIn this paper, we present the Federated Upper Confidence Bound Value Iteration algorithm ($\texttt{Fed-UCBVI}$), a novel extension of the $\texttt{UCBVI}$ algorithm (Azar et al., 2017) tailored for the federated learning framework. We prove that the regret of $\texttt{Fed-UCBVI}$ scales as $\tilde O(\sqrt{H^3 |S| |A| T / M})$, with a small additional term due to heterogeneity, where $|S|$ is the number of states, $|A|$ is the number of actions, $H$ is the episode length, $M$ is the number of agents, and $T$ is the number of episodes. Notably, in the single-agent setting, this upper bound matches the minimax lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors, while in the multi-agent scenario, $\texttt{Fed-UCBVI}$ has linear speed-up. To conduct our analysis, we introduce a new measure of heterogeneity, which may hold independent theoretical interest. Furthermore, we show that, unlike existing federated reinforcement learning approaches, $\texttt{Fed-UCBVI}$’s communication complexity only marginally increases with the number of agents. Safwan Labbi, Daniil Tiapkin, Lorenzo Mancini, Paul Mangold, Eric Moulines |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2025 | Refined Analysis of Constant Step Size Federated Averaging and Federated Richardson-Romberg ExtrapolationabstractIn this paper, we present a novel analysis of $\texttt{FedAvg}$ with constant step size, relying on the Markov property of the underlying process. We demonstrate that the global iterates of the algorithm converge to a stationary distribution and analyze its resulting bias and variance relative to the problem’s solution. We provide a first-order bias expansion in both homogeneous and heterogeneous settings. Interestingly, this bias decomposes into two distinct components: one that depends solely on stochastic gradient noise and another on client heterogeneity. Finally, we introduce a new algorithm based on the Richardson-Romberg extrapolation technique to mitigate this bias. Paul Mangold, Alain Durmus, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Sergey Samsonov, Eric Moulines |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2025 | Scaffold with Stochastic Gradients: New Analysis with Linear Speed-UpabstractThis paper proposes a novel analysis for the Scaffold algorithm, a popular method for dealing with data heterogeneity in federated learning. While its convergence in deterministic settings—where local control variates mitigate client drift—is well established, the impact of stochastic gradient updates on its performance is less understood. To address this problem, we first show that its global parameters and control variates define a Markov chain that converges to a stationary distribution in the Wasserstein distance. Leveraging this result, we prove that Scaffold achieves linear speed-up in the number of clients up to higher-order terms in the step size. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals that Scaffold retains a higher-order bias, similar to FedAvg, that does not decrease as the number of clients increases. This highlights opportunities for developing improved stochastic federated learning algorithms. Paul Mangold, Alain Durmus, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Eric Moulines |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | The Relative Gaussian Mechanism and its Application to Private Gradient DescentabstractThe Gaussian Mechanism (GM), which consists in adding Gaussian noise to a vector-valued query before releasing it, is a standard privacy protection mechanism. In particular, given that the query respects some L2 sensitivity property (the L2 distance between outputs on any two neighboring inputs is bounded), GM guarantees Rényi Differential Privacy (RDP). Unfortunately, precisely bounding the L2 sensitivity can be hard, thus leading to loose privacy bounds. In this work, we consider a Relative L2 sensitivity assumption, in which the bound on the distance between two query outputs may also depend on their norm. Leveraging this assumption, we introduce the Relative Gaussian Mechanism (RGM), in which the variance of the noise depends on the norm of the output. We prove tight bounds on the RDP parameters under relative L2 sensitivity, and characterize the privacy loss incurred by using output-dependent noise. In particular, we show that RGM naturally adapts to a latent variable that would control the norm of the output. Finally, we instantiate our framework to show tight guarantees for Private Gradient Descent, a problem that naturally fits our relative L2 sensitivity assumption. Hadrien Hendrikx, Paul Mangold, Aurélien Bellet |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2024 | SCAFFLSA: Taming Heterogeneity in Federated Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD LearningabstractIn this paper, we analyze the sample and communication complexity of the federated linear stochastic approximation (FedLSA) algorithm. We explicitly quantify the effects of local training with agent heterogeneity. We show that the communication complexity of FedLSA scales polynomially with the inverse of the desired accuracy ϵ. To overcome this, we propose SCAFFLSA a new variant of FedLSA that uses control variates to correct for client drift, and establish its sample and communication complexities. We show that for statistically heterogeneous agents, its communication complexity scales logarithmically with the desired accuracy, similar to Scaffnew. An important finding is that, compared to the existing results for Scaffnew, the sample complexity scales with the inverse of the number of agents, a property referred to as linear speed-up. Achieving this linear speed-up requires completely new theoretical arguments. We apply the proposed method to federated temporal difference learning with linear function approximation and analyze the corresponding complexity improvements. Paul Mangold, Sergey Samsonov, Safwan Labbi, Ilya Levin, Réda Alami, Alexey Naumov, Eric Moulines |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | High-Dimensional Private Empirical Risk Minimization by Greedy Coordinate DescentabstractIn this paper, we study differentially private empirical risk minimization (DP-ERM). It has been shown that the worst-case utility of DP-ERM reduces polynomially as the dimension increases. This is a major obstacle to privately learning large machine learning models. In high dimension, it is common for some model’s parameters to carry more information than others. To exploit this, we propose a differentially private greedy coordinate descent (DP-GCD) algorithm. At each iteration, DP-GCD privately performs a coordinate-wise gradient step along the gradients’ (approximately) greatest entry. We show theoretically that DP-GCD can achieve a logarithmic dependence on the dimension for a wide range of problems by naturally exploiting their structural properties (such as quasi-sparse solutions). We illustrate this behavior numerically, both on synthetic and real datasets. Paul Mangold, Aurélien Bellet, Joseph Salmon, Marc Tommasi |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2023 | Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in ClassificationabstractWe theoretically study the impact of differential privacy on fairness in classification. We prove that, given a class of models, popular group fairness measures are pointwise Lipschitz-continuous with respect to the parameters of the model. This result is a consequence of a more general statement on accuracy conditioned on an arbitrary event (such as membership to a sensitive group), which may be of independent interest. We use this Lipschitz property to prove a non-asymptotic bound showing that, as the number of samples increases, the fairness level of private models gets closer to the one of their non-private counterparts. This bound also highlights the importance of the confidence margin of a model on the disparate impact of differential privacy. Paul Mangold, Michaël Perrot, Aurélien Bellet, Marc Tommasi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Differentially Private Coordinate Descent for Composite Empirical Risk MinimizationabstractMachine learning models can leak information about the data used to train them. To mitigate this issue, Differentially Private (DP) variants of optimization algorithms like Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) have been designed to trade-off utility for privacy in Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) problems. In this paper, we propose Differentially Private proximal Coordinate Descent (DP-CD), a new method to solve composite DP-ERM problems. We derive utility guarantees through a novel theoretical analysis of inexact coordinate descent. Our results show that, thanks to larger step sizes, DP-CD can exploit imbalance in gradient coordinates to outperform DP-SGD. We also prove new lower bounds for composite DP-ERM under coordinate-wise regularity assumptions, that are nearly matched by DP-CD. For practical implementations, we propose to clip gradients using coordinate-wise thresholds that emerge from our theory, avoiding costly hyperparameter tuning. Experiments on real and synthetic data support our results, and show that DP-CD compares favorably with DP-SGD. Paul Mangold, Aurélien Bellet, Joseph Salmon, Marc Tommasi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare SettingsabstractFederated Learning (FL) is a novel approach enabling several clients holding sensitive data to collaboratively train machine learning models, without centralizing data. The cross-silo FL setting corresponds to the case of few ($2$--$50$) reliable clients, each holding medium to large datasets, and is typically found in applications such as healthcare, finance, or industry. While previous works have proposed representative datasets for cross-device FL, few realistic healthcare cross-silo FL datasets exist, thereby slowing algorithmic research in this critical application. In this work, we propose a novel cross-silo dataset suite focused on healthcare, FLamby (Federated Learning AMple Benchmark of Your cross-silo strategies), to bridge the gap between theory and practice of cross-silo FL.FLamby encompasses 7 healthcare datasets with natural splits, covering multiple tasks, modalities, and data volumes, each accompanied with baseline training code. As an illustration, we additionally benchmark standard FL algorithms on all datasets.Our flexible and modular suite allows researchers to easily download datasets, reproduce results and re-use the different components for their research. FLamby is available at~\url{www.github.com/owkin/flamby}. Jean Ogier du Terrail, Samy-Safwan Ayed, Edwige Cyffers, Felix Grimberg, Chaoyang He 0001, Régis Loeb, Paul Mangold, Tanguy Marchand, Othmane Marfoq, Erum Mushtaq, Boris Muzellec, Constantin Philippenko, Santiago Silva 0001, Maria Telenczuk, Shadi Albarqouni, Amir Salman Avestimehr, Aurélien Bellet, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Martin Jaggi, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Marco Lorenzi, Giovanni Neglia, Marc Tommasi, Mathieu Andreux |
NeurIPS | 7 |