Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zach Nussbaum

dblp:298/1623 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
code search
0.912025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025
Information retrieval
ranking
0.912025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025
Information retrieval
reranking
0.912025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
bug localization
0.312025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hard negative mining · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking
abstract
Effective code retrieval plays a crucial role in advancing code generation, bug fixing, and software maintenance, particularly as software systems increase in complexity. While current code embedding models have demonstrated promise in retrieving code snippets for small-scale, well-defined tasks, they often underperform in more demanding real-world applications such as bug localization within GitHub repositories. We hypothesize that a key issue is their reliance on noisy and inconsistent datasets for training, which impedes their ability to generalize to more complex retrieval scenarios. To address these limitations, we introduce CoRNStack, a large-scale, high-quality contrastive training dataset for code that spans multiple programming languages. This dataset is curated using consistency filtering to eliminate noisy positives and is further enriched with mined hard negatives, thereby facilitating more effective learning. We demonstrate that contrastive training of embedding models using CoRNStack leads to state-of-the-art performance across a variety of code retrieval tasks. Furthermore, the dataset can be leveraged for training code reranking models, a largely underexplored area compared to text reranking. Our finetuned code reranking model significantly improves the ranking quality over the retrieved results. Finally, by employing our code retriever and reranker together, we demonstrate significant improvements in function localization for GitHub issues, an important component of real-world software development.
Tarun Suresh, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Zach Nussbaum, Andriy Mulyar, Brandon Duderstadt, Heng Ji 0001
ICLR4