Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Warren J. Erikson

dblp:298/1809 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1974
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking		 0.011974
The value of CPU utilization as a criterion for computer system usage · SIGMETRICS 1974
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization		 0.011974
The value of CPU utilization as a criterion for computer system usage · SIGMETRICS 1974
Operating systems › resource management › process management
CPU scheduling		 0.011974
The value of CPU utilization as a criterion for computer system usage · SIGMETRICS 1974
Operating systems › resource management › process management › multiprogramming
time-sharing systems		 0.011974
The value of CPU utilization as a criterion for computer system usage · SIGMETRICS 1974

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cost analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1974 The value of CPU utilization as a criterion for computer system usage
abstract
It is generally agreed that a computer system's CPU utilization means little by itself, but there has been only a limited amount of research to determine the value of CPU utilization when used with other performance measures. This paper focuses on time-sharing systems (or similar systems such as some remote batch systems) as viewed by someone who wants to minimize the mean cost per job run on the system.
Warren J. Erikson
 SIGMETRICS1