Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elizaveta Golos
dblp:298/7099
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1689-7345ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Cellular and mobile networks · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Energy-efficient computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cellular and mobile networks
5G NR |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Battery Lifetime and Power Consumption in 5G Systems With Intra- and Inter-RAT Dual-Connectivity · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Energy-efficient computing
mobile device energy management |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Battery Lifetime and Power Consumption in 5G Systems With Intra- and Inter-RAT Dual-Connectivity · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Cellular and mobile networks
millimeter-wave communication |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Battery Lifetime and Power Consumption in 5G Systems With Intra- and Inter-RAT Dual-Connectivity · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
measurement study · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Battery Lifetime and Power Consumption in 5G Systems With Intra- and Inter-RAT Dual-ConnectivityabstractThe 5G millimeter wave (mmWave) New Radio (NR) systems are prone to blockage and micromobility effects. To improve service reliability, 3GPP proposed a dual-connectivity allowing UE to maintain links to two base stations (BS). However, this functionality is power-hungry resulting in a trade-off between performance and power efficiency. In this paper, we compare user equipment (UE) power efficiency, consumption, and battery lifetime for different intra- and inter-radio access technologies single- and dual-connectivity under different UE usage scenarios, micromobility, and blockage impairments. We evaluate five schemes: (i) BSs in FR1 and FR2 bands (NR-DC FR1/FR2), (ii) BSs in FR2 band (NR-DC FR2/FR2), and (iii) LTE BS and NR BS in FR2 band (EN-DC LTE/FR2), (iv) NR FR1, and (iv) LTE. Our results show that the LTE-only scheme provides three times longer battery lifetime as compared to its nearest rival-NR FR1 single-connectivity option. For dual-connectivity options, the best lifetime is observed for EN-DC FR2/LTE, and the worst – for NR-DC FR2/FR1. The difference between NR-DC FR2/FR1 and NR-DC FR2/FR2 schemes is negligible. Densification negatively affects all the dual-connectivity schemes as it forces UEs to switch between master and backup technologies more often. We recommend EN-DC FR2/LTE for low-traffic outage-sensitive applications, while NR-DC FR2/FR2-for heavy-traffic outage non-sensitive applications. Darya Y. Ostrikova, Vitalii Beschastnyi, Dmitri Moltchanov, Elizaveta Golos, Yulia Gaidamaka, Ilya Ivanov, Yevgeni Koucheryavy, Konstantin E. Samouylov |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 4 |