EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sverre Herland
dblp:298/7901
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-6702-8166ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 41% Robot manipulation · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 23% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Non-Prehensile Shape Manipulation of Elastoplastic Objects With Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2025 6-DoF Closed-Loop Grasping with Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Non-Prehensile Shape Manipulation of Elastoplastic Objects With Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2025 6-DoF Closed-Loop Grasping with Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
deformable object manipulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-Prehensile Shape Manipulation of Elastoplastic Objects With Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
6-dof grasping |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | 6-DoF Closed-Loop Grasping with Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | 6-DoF Closed-Loop Grasping with Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
motion compensation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Vessel-to-Vessel Motion Compensation with Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Vessel-to-Vessel Motion Compensation with Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Vessel-to-Vessel Motion Compensation with Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
domain randomization · 1.6deep reinforcement learning · 1.6image augmentation · 0.8actor-critic · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.7inverse kinematics · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Non-Prehensile Shape Manipulation of Elastoplastic Objects With Reinforcement LearningabstractWe present a novel framework for non-prehensile shape manipulation of deformable objects using Deep Reinforcement Learning. Unlike previous approaches that rely on grasping, our method employs a sequence of gentle pushing actions to deform objects into target shapes. We introduce a continuous parametrization of pushing actions that allows for precise control over pushing trajectories, enabling more flexible and efficient manipulation. The framework is applicable to a wide range of objects by representing them as sampled boundary coordinates, removing the need for predefined object partitions. Trained entirely in simulation, our controller demonstrates zero-shot transfer to real-world scenarios without additional training. Extensive evaluations show that our approach not only matches but substantially exceeds the performance of previous methods, while being more gentle and efficient. We demonstrate successful manipulation across various deformable objects and materials, including food items like salmon and pork loin. This work represents a significant advancement in robotic manipulation of deformable objects, with potential applications in food processing, manufacturing, and beyond. Sverre Herland, Ekrem Misimi |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | 6-DoF Closed-Loop Grasping with Reinforcement LearningabstractWe present a novel vision-based, 6-DoF grasping framework based on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) that is capable of directly synthesizing continuous 6-DoF actions in cartesian space. Our proposed approach uses visual observations from an eye-in-hand RGB-D camera, and we mitigate the sim-to-real gap with a combination of domain randomization, image augmentation, and segmentation tools. Our method consists of an off-policy, maximum-entropy, Actor-Critic algorithm that learns a policy from a binary reward and a few simulated example grasps. It does not need any real-world grasping examples, is trained completely in simulation, and is deployed directly to the real world without any fine-tuning. The efficacy of our approach is demonstrated in simulation and experimentally validated in the real world on 6-DoF grasping tasks, achieving state-of-the-art results of an 86% mean zero-shot success rate on previously unseen objects, an 85% mean zero-shot success rate on a class of previously unseen adversarial objects, and a 74.3% mean zero-shot success rate on a class of previously unseen, challenging "6-DoF" objects.Raw footage of real-world validation can be found at https://youtu.be/bwPf8Imvook Sverre Herland, Kerstin Bach, Ekrem Misimi |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | SelfPAB: large-scale pre-training on accelerometer data for human activity recognitionabstractAbstract Annotating accelerometer-based physical activity data remains a challenging task, limiting the creation of robust supervised machine learning models due to the scarcity of large, labeled, free-living human activity recognition (HAR) datasets. Researchers are exploring self-supervised learning (SSL) as an alternative to relying solely on labeled data approaches. However, there has been limited exploration of the impact of large-scale, unlabeled datasets for SSL pre-training on downstream HAR performance, particularly utilizing more than one accelerometer. To address this gap, a transformer encoder network is pre-trained on various amounts of unlabeled, dual-accelerometer data from the HUNT4 dataset: 10, 100, 1k, 10k, and 100k hours. The objective is to reconstruct masked segments of signal spectrograms. This pre-trained model, termed SelfPAB, serves as a feature extractor for downstream supervised HAR training across five datasets (HARTH, HAR70+, PAMAP2, Opportunity, and RealWorld). SelfPAB outperforms purely supervised baselines and other SSL methods, demonstrating notable enhancements, especially for activities with limited training data. Results show that more pre-training data improves downstream HAR performance, with the 100k-hour model exhibiting the highest performance. It surpasses purely supervised baselines by absolute F1-score improvements of 7.1% (HARTH), 14% (HAR70+), and an average of 11.26% across the PAMAP2, Opportunity, and RealWorld datasets. Compared to related SSL methods, SelfPAB displays absolute F1-score enhancements of 10.4% (HARTH), 18.8% (HAR70+), and 16% (average across PAMAP2, Opportunity, RealWorld). Aleksej Logacjov, Sverre Herland, Astrid Ustad, Kerstin Bach |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 2023 | Vessel-to-Vessel Motion Compensation with Reinforcement LearningabstractActuation delay poses a challenge for robotic arms and cranes. This is especially the case in dynamic environments where the robot arm or the objects it is trying to manipulate are moved by exogenous forces. In this paper, we consider the task of using a robotic arm to compensate for relative motion between two vessels at sea. We construct a hybrid controller that combines an Inverse Kinematic (IK) solver with a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent that issues small corrections to the IK input. The solution is empirically evaluated in a simulated environment under several sea states and actuation delays. We observe that more intense waves and larger actuation delays have an adverse effect on the IK controller's ability to compensate for vessel motion. The RL agent is shown to be effective at mitigating large parts of these errors, both in the average case and in the worst case. Its modest requirement for sensory information, combined with the inherent safety in only making small adjustments, also makes it a promising approach for real-world deployment. Sverre Herland, Kerstin Bach |
AAAI | 1 |