Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Emir Akdere

dblp:299/4593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% Reinforcement learning · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action selection
0.512021
BKT-POMDP: Fast Action Selection for User Skill Modelling over Tasks with Multiple Skills · IJCAI 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process
0.512021
BKT-POMDP: Fast Action Selection for User Skill Modelling over Tasks with Multiple Skills · IJCAI 2021
Learning and educational technologies
intelligent tutoring systems
0.112021
BKT-POMDP: Fast Action Selection for User Skill Modelling over Tasks with Multiple Skills · IJCAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

point-based POMDP planning · 1.0information gain · 1.0bayesian knowledge tracing · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 BKT-POMDP: Fast Action Selection for User Skill Modelling over Tasks with Multiple Skills
abstract
Creating an accurate model of a user's skills is necessary for intelligent tutoring systems. Without an accurate model, sample problems or tasks must be selected haphazardly by the tutor. Once an accurate model has been trained, the tutor can selectively focus on training essential or deficient skills. Prior work offers mechanisms for optimizing the training of a single skill or for multiple skills when individual tasks involve testing only a single skill at a time, but not for multiple skills when individual tasks can contain evidence for multiple skills. In this paper, we present a system that estimates user skill models for multiple skills by selecting tasks which maximize the information gain across the entire skill model. We compare our system's policy against several baselines and an optimal policy in both simulated and real tasks. Our system outperforms baselines and performs almost on par with the optimal policy.
Nicole Salomons, Emir Akdere, Brian Scassellati
IJCAI2