Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xingjie Zhou

dblp:299/5121 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-9159-1536ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Storage systems · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 55% Efficient and distributed learning · 29% Language models and text generation · 16%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › data reduction
data deduplication
1.822026
RefineDedup: efficient deduplication for mobile systems via application-wise learning · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026
FinerDedup: Sifting Fingerprints for Efficient Data Deduplication on Mobile Devices · DAC 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning security
0.912025
FLGuardian: Defending Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Fine-Grained Detection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › federated learning security
model poisoning defense
0.912025
FLGuardian: Defending Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Fine-Grained Detection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
0.512021
Language Scaling: Applications, Challenges and Approaches · KDD 2021
Operating systems
mobile systems
0.312026
RefineDedup: efficient deduplication for mobile systems via application-wise learning · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.312025
FLGuardian: Defending Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Fine-Grained Detection in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

application-wise learning · 2.0trust scoring · 1.7pairwise euclidean distance · 1.7pairwise cosine distance · 1.7clustering · 1.7random forest · 0.8bloom filter · 0.8model transfer · 0.5data transfer · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 RefineDedup: efficient deduplication for mobile systems via application-wise learning
Wei Li 0322, Xianzhang Chen, Xingjie Zhou, Duo Liu 0002, Yujuan Tan, Ao Ren, Kan Zhong, Lei Qiao 0002
Sci. China Inf. Sci.3
2025 FLGuardian: Defending Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Fine-Grained Detection in Federated Learning
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative machine learning paradigm allowing participants to train a global model collaboratively without sharing training data. The distributed nature makes FL vulnerable to the untargeted or backdoor model poisoning attacks (MPAs). Hence, lots of defense methods are proposed to secure FL. However, existing defenses are ineffective in defending against the emerging stealthy layer-space MPA, since the defenses either focus on the model space or ignore the disparities between the layers. In this paper, we propose a novel layer-space defense method called FLGuardian that can protect the global model from the state-of-the-art MPAs. FLGuardian first employs a new layer-wise detection to find out the benign clients for each layer through pairwise cosine distances and pairwise Euclidean distances combined with a clustering algorithm. Then, FLGuardian assigns a trust score for each client according to the detection results of all the layers, where a deeper layer in the model brings a higher weight in the scoring. Finally, we select several clients with the highest scores for updating the global model. Experimental results show that FLGuardian excels nine typical defense methods against seven state-of-the-art MPAs in most cases. Particularly, under LPattack, the emerging layer-space backdoor MPA, FLGuardian secures Backdoor Success Rate (BSR) below 3% while other defenses have over 93% BSRs on CIFAR-10. Moreover, FLGuardian remains robust against adaptive attacks tailored to FLGuardian.
Xingjie Zhou, Xianzhang Chen, Shukan Liu, Xuehong Fan, Qiao Sun 0007, Lin Chen 0031, Meikang Qiu, Tao Xiang 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2024 FinerDedup: Sifting Fingerprints for Efficient Data Deduplication on Mobile Devices
abstract
Data deduplication is promised to extend the lifetime and capacity of storage on mobile devices. However, existing data deduplication works show high memory consumption and indexing costs for maintaining a fingerprint for each data block, especially when the duplicate ratio of data blocks on mobile systems is about 10% to 30%. In this paper, we propose a novel approach called FinerDedup to optimize the memory costs and retrieval efficiency of data deduplication. FinerDedup drastically reduces the number of fingerprints by screening out the duplicate data blocks via random forest and Bloom filter. We implement FinerDedup on real mobile devices with Android 10 and evaluate it with real workloads. Extensive experimental results show that FinerDedup can reduce 85% of fingerprints and 20% of I/O latency over the widely-used DmDedup.
Xianzhang Chen, Xingjie Zhou, Wei Li 0322, Duo Liu 0002, Yujuan Tan, Ao Ren
DAC2
2021 Language Scaling: Applications, Challenges and Approaches
abstract
Language scaling aims to deploy Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications economically across many countries/regions with different languages. Language scaling has been heavily invested by industry since many parties want to deploy their applications/services to global markets. At the same time, scaling out NLP applications to various languages, essentially a data science problem, remains a grand challenge due to the huge differences in the morphology, syntaxes, and pragmatics among different languages. We present a comprehensive survey and tutorial on language scaling. We start with a clear problem description for language scaling and an intuitive discussion on the overall challenges. Then, we outline two major categories of approaches to language scaling, namely, model transfer and data transfer. We present a taxonomy to summarize various methods in literature. A large part of the tutorial is organized to address various types of NLP applications. Finally, we discuss several important challenges in this area and future directions.
Linjun Shou, Ming Gong 0001, Jian Pei 0001, Xiubo Geng, Xingjie Zhou, Daxin Jiang
KDD5