Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Nahin Kumar Dey

dblp:299/6087 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4229-8477ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving sensing
0.812024
Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry? · MobiCom 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual odometry
monocular visual odometry
0.212024
Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry? · MobiCom 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry
0.212024
Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry? · MobiCom 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

laplacian noise · 1.5gaussian noise · 1.5gaussian blur · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Poster: Do Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation Techniques Degrade the Accuracy of Odometry?
abstract
On-device sensors in mobile systems, e.g., autonomous vehicles and AR/VR, use odometry for real-time positioning, but they risk capturing sensitive data of non-consenting bystanders. Prior works have investigated various privacy-preserving techniques to protect those sensitive data. However, it is still unclear about the impact of such approaches on the accuracy of odometry. In this work, we investigate the impact of various privacy-preserving obfuscation techniques on the accuracy of monocular visual odometry. We focus on three widely used obfuscation methods: Gaussian Blur, Gaussian Noise, and Laplacian Noise, applied to protect bystander privacy. Our investigation reveals that some obfuscation techniques can increase the odometry errors by up to 56.9%, while others surprisingly reduce the errors by up to 66.8%, compared to raw data. Our key findings indicate that data obfuscation primarily affects the duration of tracking loss in ORB-SLAM3, which is the main source of the errors, and successful relocalization immediately following tracking loss plays a crucial role in reducing the overall errors.
Nikolaos Ntokos, Nahin Kumar Dey, Jiayi Meng, Faysal Hossain Shezan
MobiCom2