Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas J. Shaffner

dblp:299/6794 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Integrated circuit design · 44% High-performance computing · 44% Electronic design automation · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design
semiconductor device characterization
0.012000
Semiconductor characterization and analytical technology · Proc. IEEE 2000
High-performance computing
structural analysis
0.012000
Semiconductor characterization and analytical technology · Proc. IEEE 2000
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Correction to "semiconductor characterization and analytical technology"
Thomas J. Shaffner
Proc. IEEE1
2000 Semiconductor characterization and analytical technology
abstract
The utility of semiconductor characterization techniques continues to be measured by industry requirements for smaller device geometry, atomically smooth surfaces and interfaces, and increased material purity. Those techniques that specialize in the microspot and structural analysis of microcircuits are reviewed in this paper with examples of applications to manufacturing and process development. Brief tutorials, case studies, and comparisons show how the strengths and weaknesses of each should be understood before selecting those methods most suitable for the problem at hand.
Thomas J. Shaffner
Proc. IEEE1