Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sean Katagiri

dblp:299/7552 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 67% Robot navigation and mapping · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
perception-aware planning
0.712023
Adaptive Heading for Perception-Aware Trajectory Following · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.712023
Adaptive Heading for Perception-Aware Trajectory Following · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.712023
Adaptive Heading for Perception-Aware Trajectory Following · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

utility optimization · 0.7ray casting · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Adaptive Heading for Perception-Aware Trajectory Following
abstract
This paper presents an adaptive heading approach for perception awareness during trajectory following. By adapting the heading of a robot to improve the feature tracking in the current mapped environment, the accuracy in localisation can be improved. This can have a significant advantage for autonomous operations in GPS-denied environments such as subsea or in caves. The aim of the proposed approach is to position the sensor used for perception and feature tracking in such a way that it; obtains a view that contains a good observation of the previously mapped environment, face forward along the direction of travel, reduces the change in heading and view the perceived environment along the surface's estimated normals. These 4 objectives create a weighted utility function that is used to find the most beneficial heading. The benefit is a system that improves feature tracking for simultaneous localisation and mapping (SLAM) while considering the safety of the robot by being aware of its surrounding. To sense the environment, a simulated sensor is discretised to a set of vertical rays based on the vertical field of view. The vertical rays are swept 360 degrees around a position to evaluate for a new heading. This allows for the simulated sensor data from ray casting to be reused and therefore reduces the computational load to find the heading which maximises the utility function. The paper is focused on holonomic robots capable of controlling the robot's heading or sensor orientation independently from the position. We present results and evaluation in a simulated environment where we show a great improvement in the SLAM's pose estimation. In addition, we endow an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) with the proposed approach during field trials and present the result in two different environments.
Jonatan Scharff Willners, Sean Katagiri, Shida Xu, Tomasz Luczynski, Joshua Roe, Yvan R. Petillot
ICRA2