Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yanwei Jia
dblp:299/7757
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | q-Learning in Continuous Time · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale Approach · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.8 | 2 | 2023 | Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 q-Learning in Continuous Time · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning › q-learning
continuous-time q-learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | q-Learning in Continuous Time · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | q-Learning in Continuous Time · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale Approach · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale Approach · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic approximation · 1.8martingale theory · 1.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | q-Learning in Continuous TimeabstractWe study the continuous-time counterpart of Q-learning for reinforcement learning (RL) under the entropy-regularized, exploratory diffusion process formulation introduced by Wang et al. (2020). As the conventional (big) Q-function collapses in continuous time, we consider its first-order approximation and coin the term “(little) q-function". This function is related to the instantaneous advantage rate function as well as the Hamiltonian. We develop a “q-learning" theory around the q-function that is independent of time discretization. Given a stochastic policy, we jointly characterize the associated q-function and value function by martingale conditions of certain stochastic processes, in both on-policy and off-policy settings. We then apply the theory to devise different actor--critic algorithms for solving underlying RL problems, depending on whether or not the density function of the Gibbs measure generated from the q-function can be computed explicitly. One of our algorithms interprets the well-known Q-learning algorithm SARSA, and another recovers a policy gradient (PG) based continuous-time algorithm proposed in Jia and Zhou (2022b). Finally, we conduct simulation experiments to compare the performance of our algorithms with those of PG-based algorithms in Jia and Zhou (2022b) and time-discretized conventional Q-learning algorithms. Yanwei Jia, Xun Yu Zhou |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale ApproachabstractWe propose a unified framework to study policy evaluation (PE) and the associated temporal difference (TD) methods for reinforcement learning in continuous time and space. We show that PE is equivalent to maintaining the martingale condition of a process. From this perspective, we find that the mean-square TD error approximates the quadratic variation of the martingale and thus is not a suitable objective for PE. We present two methods to use the martingale characterization for designing PE algorithms. The first one minimizes a “martingale loss function", whose solution is proved to be the best approximation of the true value function in the mean--square sense. This method interprets the classical gradient Monte-Carlo algorithm. The second method is based on a system of equations called the “martingale orthogonality conditions" with test functions. Solving these equations in different ways recovers various classical TD algorithms, such as TD($\lambda$), LSTD, and GTD. Different choices of test functions determine in what sense the resulting solutions approximate the true value function. Moreover, we prove that any convergent time-discretized algorithm converges to its continuous-time counterpart as the mesh size goes to zero, and we provide the convergence rate. We demonstrate the theoretical results and corresponding algorithms with numerical experiments and applications. Yanwei Jia, Xun Yu Zhou |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and AlgorithmsabstractWe study policy gradient (PG) for reinforcement learning in continuous time and space under the regularized exploratory formulation developed by Wang et al. (2020). We represent the gradient of the value function with respect to a given parameterized stochastic policy as the expected integration of an auxiliary running reward function that can be evaluated using samples and the current value function. This representation effectively turns PG into a policy evaluation (PE) problem, enabling us to apply the martingale approach recently developed by Jia and Zhou (2022a) for PE to solve our PG problem. Based on this analysis, we propose two types of actor-critic algorithms for RL, where we learn and update value functions and policies simultaneously and alternatingly. The first type is based directly on the aforementioned representation, which involves future trajectories and is offline. The second type, designed for online learning, employs the first-order condition of the policy gradient and turns it into martingale orthogonality conditions. These conditions are then incorporated using stochastic approximation when updating policies. Finally, we demonstrate the algorithms by simulations in two concrete examples. Yanwei Jia, Xun Yu Zhou |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |