Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Helen Dong

dblp:299/8739 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-8514-4075ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › end-user programming
computational notebooks
0.512021
A qualitative study of cleaning in Jupyter notebooks · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2021
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.512021
A qualitative study of cleaning in Jupyter notebooks · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative study · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 A qualitative study of cleaning in Jupyter notebooks
abstract
Data scientists commonly use computational notebooks because they provide a good environment for testing multiple models. However, once the scientist completes the code and finds the ideal model, the data scientist will have to dedicate time to clean up the code in order for others to understand it. In this paper, we perform a qualitative study on how scientists clean their code in hopes of being able to suggest a tool to automate this process. Our end goal is for tool builders to address possible gaps and provide additional aid to data scientists, who can then focus more on their actual work rather than the routine and tedious cleaning duties.
Helen Dong
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1