Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nacime Bouziani

dblp:299/8924 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 67% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.512021
Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Bandits · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › non-parametric bandit
gaussian process bandits
0.512021
Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Bandits · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.512021
Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Bandits · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.5gaussian process · 0.5confidence intervals · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Bandits
abstract
Consider the sequential optimization of a continuous, possibly non-convex, and expensive to evaluate objective function $f$. The problem can be cast as a Gaussian Process (GP) bandit where $f$ lives in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The state of the art analysis of several learning algorithms shows a significant gap between the lower and upper bounds on the simple regret performance. When $N$ is the number of exploration trials and $\gamma_N$ is the maximal information gain, we prove an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{\gamma_N/N})$ bound on the simple regret performance of a pure exploration algorithm that is significantly tighter than the existing bounds. We show that this bound is order optimal up to logarithmic factors for the cases where a lower bound on regret is known. To establish these results, we prove novel and sharp confidence intervals for GP models applicable to RKHS elements which may be of broader interest.
Sattar Vakili, Nacime Bouziani, Sepehr Jalali, Alberto Bernacchia, Da-Shan Shiu
NeurIPS2