Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nacime Bouziani
dblp:299/8924
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 67% Learning theory · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Bandits · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › non-parametric bandit
gaussian process bandits |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Bandits · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Bandits · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.5gaussian process · 0.5confidence intervals · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process BanditsabstractConsider the sequential optimization of a continuous, possibly non-convex, and expensive to evaluate objective function $f$. The problem can be cast as a Gaussian Process (GP) bandit where $f$ lives in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The state of the art analysis of several learning algorithms shows a significant gap between the lower and upper bounds on the simple regret performance. When $N$ is the number of exploration trials and $\gamma_N$ is the maximal information gain, we prove an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{\gamma_N/N})$ bound on the simple regret performance of a pure exploration algorithm that is significantly tighter than the existing bounds. We show that this bound is order optimal up to logarithmic factors for the cases where a lower bound on regret is known. To establish these results, we prove novel and sharp confidence intervals for GP models applicable to RKHS elements which may be of broader interest. Sattar Vakili, Nacime Bouziani, Sepehr Jalali, Alberto Bernacchia, Da-Shan Shiu |
NeurIPS | 2 |