Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lei Le

dblp:30/10771 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0123-1586ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 51% Reinforcement learning · 34% Learning theory · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 67% Machine learning and data management · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
ranking
0.812024
LiRank: Industrial Large Scale Ranking Models at LinkedIn · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.722019
The Utility of Sparse Representations for Control in Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Learning Sparse Representations in Reinforcement Learning with Sparse Coding · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
representation learning for control
0.412019
The Utility of Sparse Representations for Control in Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.412019
Learning Macroscopic Brain Connectomes via Group-Sparse Factorization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning and data management
sparse learning
0.412019
Learning Macroscopic Brain Connectomes via Group-Sparse Factorization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.312018
Supervised autoencoders: Improving generalization performance with unsupervised regularizers · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › neural network representation learning › deep representation learning
supervised autoencoder
0.312018
Supervised autoencoders: Improving generalization performance with unsupervised regularizers · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
representation learning for reinforcement learning
0.312017
Learning Sparse Representations in Reinforcement Learning with Sparse Coding · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
neural network representation learning
0.112019
The Utility of Sparse Representations for Control in Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.112017
Learning Sparse Representations in Reinforcement Learning with Sparse Coding · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.5explore/exploit · 1.5dense gating · 1.5Residual DCN · 1.5tensor factorization · 0.8orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.8greedy algorithm · 0.8sparse coding · 0.4distributional regularizer · 0.4uniform stability · 0.3reconstruction error regularization · 0.3supervised sparse coding · 0.3non-convex optimization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 LiRank: Industrial Large Scale Ranking Models at LinkedIn
abstract
We present LiRank, a large-scale ranking framework at LinkedIn that brings to production state-of-the-art modeling architectures and optimization methods. We unveil several modeling improvements, including Residual DCN, which adds attention and residual connections to the famous DCNv2 architecture. We share insights into combining and tuning SOTA architectures to create a unified model, including Dense Gating, Transformers and Residual DCN. We also propose novel techniques for calibration and describe how we productionalized deep learning based explore/exploit methods.
Fedor Borisyuk, Mingzhou Zhou, Qingquan Song, Birjodh Singh Tiwana, Ganesh Parameswaran, Siddharth Dangi, Lars Hertel, Qiang Charles Xiao, Xiaochen Hou, Yunbo Ouyang, Sheallika Singh, Hailing Cheng, Lei Le, Jonathan Hung, S. Sathiya Keerthi, Ruoyan Wang, Mohit Kothari, Daqi Sun, Xun Luan, Sirou Zhu, Neil Daftary, Qianqi Shen, Chengming Jiang 0001, Haichao Wei, Maneesh Varshney, Amol Ghoting
KDD16
2019 The Utility of Sparse Representations for Control in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We investigate sparse representations for control in reinforcement learning. While these representations are widely used in computer vision, their prevalence in reinforcement learning is limited to sparse coding where extracting representations for new data can be computationally intensive. Here, we begin by demonstrating that learning a control policy incrementally with a representation from a standard neural network fails in classic control domains, whereas learning with a representation obtained from a neural network that has sparsity properties enforced is effective. We provide evidence that the reason for this is that the sparse representation provides locality, and so avoids catastrophic interference, and particularly keeps consistent, stable values for bootstrapping. We then discuss how to learn such sparse representations. We explore the idea of Distributional Regularizers, where the activation of hidden nodes is encouraged to match a particular distribution that results in sparse activation across time. We identify a simple but effective way to obtain sparse representations, not afforded by previously proposed strategies, making it more practical for further investigation into sparse representations for reinforcement learning.
Raksha Kumaraswamy, Lei Le, Martha White
AAAI3
2019 Learning Macroscopic Brain Connectomes via Group-Sparse Factorization
abstract
Mapping structural brain connectomes for living human brains typically requires expert analysis and rule-based models on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. A data-driven approach, however, could overcome limitations in such rule-based approaches and improve precision mappings for individuals. In this work, we explore a framework that facilitates applying learning algorithms to automatically extract brain connectomes. Using a tensor encoding, we design an objective with a group-regularizer that prefers biologically plausible fascicle structure. We show that the objective is convex and has unique solutions, ensuring identifiable connectomes for an individual. We develop an efficient optimization strategy for this extremely high-dimensional sparse problem, by reducing the number of parameters using a greedy algorithm designed specifically for the problem. We show that this greedy algorithm significantly improves on a standard greedy algorithm, called Orthogonal Matching Pursuit. We conclude with an analysis of the solutions found by our method, showing we can accurately reconstruct the diffusion information while maintaining contiguous fascicles with smooth direction changes.
Farzane Aminmansour, Andrew Patterson, Lei Le, Yisu Peng, Daniel Mitchell, Franco Pestilli, Cesar F. Caiafa, Russell Greiner, Martha White
NeurIPS3
2018 Supervised autoencoders: Improving generalization performance with unsupervised regularizers
abstract
Generalization performance is a central goal in machine learning, particularly when learning representations with large neural networks. A common strategy to improve generalization has been through the use of regularizers, typically as a norm constraining the parameters. Regularizing hidden layers in a neural network architecture, however, is not straightforward. There have been a few effective layer-wise suggestions, but without theoretical guarantees for improved performance. In this work, we theoretically and empirically analyze one such model, called a supervised auto-encoder: a neural network that predicts both inputs (reconstruction error) and targets jointly. We provide a novel generalization result for linear auto-encoders, proving uniform stability based on the inclusion of the reconstruction error---particularly as an improvement on simplistic regularization such as norms or even on more advanced regularizations such as the use of auxiliary tasks. Empirically, we then demonstrate that, across an array of architectures with a different number of hidden units and activation functions, the supervised auto-encoder compared to the corresponding standard neural network never harms performance and can significantly improve generalization.
Lei Le, Andrew Patterson, Martha White
NeurIPS1
2017 Learning Sparse Representations in Reinforcement Learning with Sparse Coding
abstract
A variety of representation learning approaches have been investigated for reinforcement learning; much less attention, however, has been given to investigating the utility of sparse coding. Outside of reinforcement learning, sparse coding representations have been widely used, with non-convex objectives that result in discriminative representations. In this work, we develop a supervised sparse coding objective for policy evaluation. Despite the non-convexity of this objective, we prove that all local minima are global minima, making the approach amenable to simple optimization strategies. We empirically show that it is key to use a supervised objective, rather than the more straightforward unsupervised sparse coding approach. We then compare the learned representations to a canonical fixed sparse representation, called tile-coding, demonstrating that the sparse coding representation outperforms a wide variety of tile-coding representations.
Lei Le, Raksha Kumaraswamy, Martha White
IJCAI1
2011 Comparing Theory and Measurements of Cross-Polar Fields of a Phased-Array Weather Radar
abstract
Cross-polar measurements made with an agile-beam phased-array weather radar are compared with theory. The intensity of cross-polar fields places conditions on the accuracy of meteorological measurements. Results reported herein support the hypothesis that polarimetric phased-array radar for weather observations can be designed to allow the use of the polarimetric data acquisition mode being implemented by the National Weather Service on upgraded WSR-88Ds which use parabolic reflector antennas.
Richard Doviak, Lei Le, Guifu Zhang, John Meier, Christopher D. Curtis
IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett.2